Question

In the chapter about owning versus leasing, one set of examples compares the cost of owning versus the cost of leasing for Southside Clinic, a not-for-profift organization. The net advantage to owning (versus leasing) for Southside amounted to $676. The difference between the two methods of financing: A) is so small that it might be disregarded. B) may be considered as a nearly neutral comparison between the two methods. C) is so small that it might be disregarded and may be considered as a nearly neutral comparison between the two methods. D) None of these is correct

Answer 1

Answer:

The correct answer is D) None of the above options are correct.

Explanation:

In making a decision about whether to own or lease a property, if the cost of ownership is only slightly higher than leasing, financial intelligence requires that the company, or business or entity or person checks to see if the property is an income is generating one.

If yes, then it's should be considered for purchase

If the asset is not income-generating but plugs a cost leakage, it can also be considered if the value can appreciate in value.

It only becomes advisable to lease the assets if:

1. the cost of purchasing the property far outweighs the cost of leasing as well as the current capacity of the Clinic;
2. It's an assets that is non-income generating
3. If it's a non-income generating asset that attracts lots of taxes etc.

Cheers