"To" is a preposition and park is a noun
Answer:
Metaphor
Explanation:
Metaphors compare two different objects without using like or an.
In this case, it’s comparing Prince Escalus to a beacon of truth.
Rhetorical devices have the effect of persuading readers, causing them to adopt the ideas of the author of the text.
<h3>Most common rhetorical devices and their effects.</h3>
- Logos: Reinforces logical arguments.
- Pathos: Reinforces sentimental and emotional arguments.
- Ethos: Reinforces ethical arguments.
The use of these resources makes the text richer and extends the author's persuasion, so the author can shape the reader's thoughts, making him or her support the cheerleading or reject it and see it incorrectly.
You did not inform the text to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for me to see which rhetorical resource is used. However, I hope the above information can help you.
More information about rhetorical resources at the link:
brainly.com/question/25844206
Answer:
Repetition is a literary device that makes an idea or message clearer by using it continuously.
It can also be used as a rhetorical device; a word, line or sentence repeated to make its significance in the whole text more emphatic.
From the poem above, the poet uses repetition of the word "If" to emphasizes the need for calm.
"If you can wait and not be tired by waiting," from line 5 shows that the author believes there is a reward if we meet a certain requirement.
A person can think however they want. Actions, like many have said, define a person in the end. Someone can advocate for peace with malicious intent, but they will still likely be remembered for advocating peace and not for their impure motivations. If these contradicting images are revealed to the public, that is still an act against that person, and is no longer a thought.
However, this is only from the public's view. When it comes to people, they may as well be the embodiment of their thoughts. Everything is fueled by something. The same person who seeds their own goals under the guise of peace will not think of themselves as one who acts with the intentions of bringing peace. They will be looking to call forth whatever it is that they want, and be aware that what they present to the public is not the truth.
So, both points are arguable. It depends on whether you value the individual or the community. Actions are what are remembered, and thoughts are a person's reason. Even today, this comes into relevancy because people want to know why certain figures in history did what they did. Thoughts make a person human, after all. Without thought, seperation of man and beast would be nigh impossible. Without action, man would have been left behind long ago. Both thought and action are important indeed.
