Rational numbers are numbers that can be expressed as a fraction (ratio). Irrational numbers can not be expressed like that (like sqrt(2)).
To prove your statement, assume the opposite until you have a contradiction.
If the result of adding them would be rational, then your irrational number can be expressed as the difference of two rational numbers, which itself is also a rational number. That cannot be, because it should be an irrational number. This contradiction forces that rational + irrational = irrational.
You can reason the same way for multiplication. Suppose rational * irrational = rational, you find that your irrational can be expressed as the fration of two rationals, which is a contradiction.
Answer: 0.3741
Step-by-step explanation:
Poison probability ;
P(x) = [U(^x) e(^-U)] ÷ x!
Where U = mean
Note: e = exponential symbol
Number of checks that year = 171
Number of days in a year = 365
U = 171/365 = 0.468
Average checks per day = 0.4685
Probability that at least one check was written per day is can be calculated by;
P(not 0) = 1 - P(0)
Therefore,
P(x) = [U(^x) e(^-U)] ÷ x!
P(0) = [ 0.4685^0 * e^-0.4685] ÷ 0!
P(0) = [ 1 * 0.6259] ÷ 1
P(0) = 0.6259
Therefore,
P(not 0) = 1 - 0.6259 = 0.3741
X = 4. You subtract 1 from both sidea
Answer: Third option is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
Since we have given that
6, 6, 6, 7, 8, 8, 29
We will calculate the measures of central tendency:
1) Mode - the most occurring element in the data set.
So, Mode = 6
2) Median - the middle value of organised data set
So, Median = 7
3) Mean - the average of all data set
So, Mean = 
So, we can see that Mode and Median are giving the closest value to each other, whereas Mean is giving the farthest value as compared to rest.
Hence, Mean is the least appropriate for describing the given data set.
Thus, Third option is correct.
Answer:
Hey sisters!
Step-by-step explanation:
