1 is forgot
2 is being
3 I had
4 lost
The story revolves around the narrator who is the main character. By the way he speak (through the dialogue), it may be concluded that he is likely poor, uneducated, and does not want to get involved in any trouble. The other character asked the narrator to pair up with him in robbing some white folks. He convinced the narrator by using against him his physical state of being hungry. At the end the other character got everything and the narrator was left with nothing and even got hungrier. He asked the question of "What is with white folks, and why reckon them?" to his readers.
I think this might mean that you or on the wrong side of an idea or topic . If you are on the other side you would be on the good/ right side of the fence
The phrase that describes one way to determine if a source is credible is:
- Confirm that the author is well-educated on the subject
<h3>What is Credibility?</h3>
Credibility in writing refers to the right of an individual to speak on a subject matter. If an author has little knowledge and experience in a particular field, then they do not have the credibility to talk about that subject.
Experience and knowledge are vital factors to check when measuring credibility.
Learn more about credibility here:
brainly.com/question/1279931
#SPJ1
The boy played football (past tense)
The boy plays football (present tense)
The boy will play football (future tense)
