I think its 31* but im not sure
"Rationalizing the denominator" of a number is exactly what its title implies: turning its denominator into a rational number.
For an example, let's take the fraction 1/√2. We call √2 <em>irrational</em> because it cannot be expressed as a <em>ratio </em>of two integers. Oftentimes when we have irrational numbers like √2 in the denominator, it helps to perform a little bit of algebraic manipulation on them to make the denominator rational. Here's where that "form of 1" comes in. Remember that, as a rational number, 1 can be expressed as n/n, where n is any number. We can use this fact to rationalize the denominator of 1/√2 <em />by multiplying it by √2/√2, which is equivalent to 1.
When we multiply the two together, we get:
![\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\cdot \frac{\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{2}}= \frac{\sqrt{2}}{(\sqrt{2})^2}= \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7B2%7D%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Csqrt%7B2%7D%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7B2%7D%7D%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Csqrt%7B2%7D%7D%7B%28%5Csqrt%7B2%7D%29%5E2%7D%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Csqrt%7B2%7D%7D%7B2%7D%20)
Crucially, multiplying by 1 in the form of √2/√2 <em>keeps the fraction's value the same</em>, since 1 times any number just equals that same number. If we weren't multiplying but some form of 1, we'd change the number entirely, making the whole attempt at rationalizing the denominator pointless.
Answer:
I think the answer is B
Step-by-step explanation:
he would need to factor 4x² in order to get his answer not just 4x
Hi there!
Answer:
<em><u>5g+70</u></em>
Step-by-step explanation:
Distributive property: ⇒ a(b+c)=ab+ac
a=5, b=g, c=14
5g+5*14
14*5=70
70/5=14
70/14=5
5*14=70
=5g+70
Hope this helps!
Answer:
Minimum-E
Maximum-C
First Quartile-A
Third Quartile-D
Median-B
Step-by-step explanation: