Answer:
the correct answer is 3.)
Explanation:
Ad hoc
Answer:
For long it has been the received opinion that judges filled in the gaps left by rules by using their discretion. Positivistic jurisprudence from Austin to Hart placed strong emphasis on the part played by judges in the exercise of their discretion. "In these cases it is clear", Hart has said, "that the rule-making authority must exercise discretion, and there is no possibility of treating the question raised by the various cases as if there were one uniquely correct answer to be found, as distinct from an answer which is a reasonable compromise between many conflicting interests". A competing view was espoused by the realists who placed absolute emphasis on the discretion of judges and relegated the "rules" to an obscure position. Earlier, little attention was paid to the analysis of discretion. However, a determined effort has been made lately by Ronald Dworkin, who has cast serious doubts on the orthodox opinion and has emerged as the principal opponent of Hart. Dworkin's views have posed a sustained challenge to the positivist account and have received critical acclaim by leading jurists of the world.
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
The Supreme Court of The United States of America is a federal court that hears cases by the government of the nation and any type of case coming from the state courts that involves the constitution and federal law.
They choose the cases from the appellate courts that they will consider and Certiorari is usually being granted when the court agrees to take part in the case. The number of cases they accept in a year is usually very low, between hundred to five hundred of over 7000 cases being sent to them annually.
It’s probably the Supreme court
Answer:
Supervision, pre-parole report, parole plan, parole grant hearing, termination are the stages of parole release process.
Explanation:
Parole can be defined as the early release of prison, before the prisoner has served the entire sentence. In the process, the first stage comes as the supervision, in this stage remain under supervision for the balance of their sentence.
Then the pre-parole report prepare in the basis of his/her behaviour and then parole plan prepared. After that the a group of officials not judges hear the report and plan and if they found behaviour of the person suitable and valid reasons for parole, the they grant or terminate the permission.