Answer:
It really depends on a person. For some, living in order to achieve glory is enough; for others, it is not.
If I'm to talk from my own perspective, it isn't a reasonable motivation in life. You should strive to be happy and satisfied with yourself, learn how to love and appreciate yourself, and if you only want glory and that is the reason why you study and work, I don't think it will make you truly happy when and if you achieve it. Pursuing glory is something trivial when compared to other, more important motivations in life, such as self-accomplishment and genuine happiness and satisfaction. Even when you achieve that desired glory, I believe that feeling is fleeting and that you will want to achieve something else, which makes your initial motivation worthless.
The perspective on the argument "people are defenseless against sugar" is that she believes that people are not helpless and can change their behavior as they learn more about the risks and dangers of soft drinks. Banning sugary drinks is the same as eliminating civil liberties.
The answer is A. It shows that animals depend on this process for oxygen.
Photosynthesis is how Carbon dioxide (what we breathe out) is turned into Oxygen (what we breathe in)
If Photosynthesis never took place Oxygen would run out and animals would suffocate.
Since our method of communication wasn't very reliable, I couldn't get enough details. So if you see any mistakes, I apologize. I've tried to fit the criteria you've described, and I hope it works for you.
