Answer:
(3,2)
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The answer is A.
Step-by-step explanation:
Count how many points are from 0 to 1.
In this problem, there are 8.
Next, we see how far the dot is away from zero.
The dot is on the second line from zero. Two would be your numerator, and 8 would be the denominator.
Therefore, your answer is A.
Marta’s equation has a positive y-intercept, but the scatterplot shows a negative correlation.
<h3>What is a scatter plot?</h3>
The scatter plot is a manner in which data is presented as dots on a cartesian axes, The line of best fit is a description of the data that is presented in the scatter plot.
Hence, Marta is incorrect because Marta’s equation has a positive y-intercept, but the scatterplot shows a negative correlation.
Missing parts;
Marta believes that the equation of the line of best fit for the scatterplot below is y=-5/9x+23/9. Which statement best summarizes why Marta is likely incorrect?
Marta’s equation has a positive y-intercept, but the scatterplot suggests a negative y-intercept.
Marta’s equation has a positive y-intercept, but the scatterplot shows a negative correlation.
Marta’s equation has a negative slope, but the scatterplot suggests a negative y-intercept.
Marta’s equation has a negative slope, but the scatterplot shows a positive correlation.
Learn more about scatter plot:brainly.com/question/13984412
#SPJ1
Answer:
the value of the investment after 3 years= £11,904
Step-by-step explanation:
sarah invests £9600 at a simple interest rate of 8% per year
number of years = 3
Formula for simple interest
I = P*n* r
P is the initial amount invested= 9600
r is the rate of interest = 8% = 0.08
n = number of years = 3
Now we find interest using formula
I = 9600 * 0.08 * 3= 2304
Interest amount is 2,304
Now we add the interest with the initial amount to get the value of investment after 3 years
9600 + 2304= 11904