Answer:
Create conflict
Explanation:
Based on the context clues from the sentence, we can narrow our answers down to two options: "create conflict", or "fight with". Avoid battle, set free, and accept a challenge are all illogical, as simply yelling at the animal would not lead to any of those results. With the root, prefix, and suffix meanings though, we can choose "create conflict" over "fight with". Agon means a struggle, which would allude to a conflict. Anti means against, or a struggle against the lion. Lastly, ize means cause, and with all of those put together, we get "Try not to cause struggle against the lion". This again alludes to creating a conflict amongst the lion and whoever the character is in this context. Therefore, our answer is "create conflict".
B, removing American Indians will allow white settlers to become wealthier
He declared that they were still barbarians and that trying to understand them has been a failure because the government often slaughtered its own policies or they failed. This is why it was acceptable to exclude them from their territories since they were still savages according to him, and the rest of what resembled to the Native Americans is history.
Answer:
They figured out from the internet cartouchs were
The 'rising action' of a novel is the section of the story after the exposition that builds the story's primary (and secondary) conflicts, advancing the plot. This contrasts with 'falling action', the events that come after a story's climax, leading towards a resolution.
Answer: b) thus the squire will learn to be a good landlord, and grow popular among his tenants, the mother will have eight shillings neat profit, and be fit for work till she produces another child.
This is an example of satire. Satire is a type of humor that uses exaggeration and ridicule in order to mock the vices and follies of an individual, a group of people or society at large. Satire often has the intention of shaming individuals into changing their behaviour. In this case, the author uses satire to argue that a family would benefit and be much happier if they sell their child so that he can be eaten by the rich.
