Answer:
The Supreme Court <em>c. has reduced its protections of symbolic speech dramatically, and recently has ruled against flag burning as a form of protected symbolic speech</em>.
Explanation:
<em>Symbolic speech</em> includes actions and visual aid designed to deliver specific messages regarding certain matter to the people who view products of symbolic speech. For example, political posters with caricatures constitute a symbolic speech.
As a result of United States v. O’Brien case (1968), the Supreme Court have <u>decided that symbolic speech has to be more regulated, because it involves actions but not only verbal expressions, such as burning a flag</u>.
<span>The act that protects the private information of both citizens and soldiers is the privacy act of 1974. Without this, the government and private entities would be able to access your personal data, and potentially use it for morally dubious purposes, or find out information you might want to be kept a secret.</span>
Answer:
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
I looked it up
