It comes from integrating by parts twice. Let

Recall the IBP formula,

Let


Then

Apply IBP once more, with


Notice that the ∫ v du term contains the original integral, so that




in plain and short, to graph an inequality, we first graph its EQUALITY graph, and then we do the shading.
so to graph y > x + 3, we first graph y = x + 3, which is just a line, and then do a true/false check on a point to see which side we shade.
let's hmmm check the point say (0,2), x = 0, y = 2.
y > x + 3
2 > 0 + 3
2 > 3 <--- is that true? is 2 really larger than 3? nope, so is false.
that simply means that the point (0, 2) is on the false area, so that's the area we do NOT shade, so <u>we shade the other side</u>.
y > x + 3, means "y" is greater than or larger than that line, but not equals, larger not equal, meaning the values on the borderline are not included, so the line is a dashed line.
check the picture below.
Answer:y = 3x + 2
Step-by-step explanation: y = mx + b
Where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept.
Jack's mom is purchasing thirteen tickets at a price of $11 each. This
equals a total of $143 in total spent. If Jack's mom has a credit card
limit of $500, then after purchasing $143 with the card, her available
amount to purchase additional things is $357. This impact on her
available credit is due to credit cards working on an available balance
system. When Jack's mom first received her credit card, a set balance or
total amount she could purchase with the card was set. In this example,
her total amount she could purchase with the card was $500. After her
purchase of the tickets for $143 was completed, she subtracted that
amount from her total available of $500 and that is why her available
amount to purchase is now $357.
Answer:
6.9 x 103
Step-by-step explanation: