According to Gibbons v. Ogden, a state <u>can not interfere with the power of congress to regulate commerce.</u>
<u>Explanation</u>:
The case of Gibbons and the Ogden was presented in the Supreme Court in the United States of America. It was in the year 1824 and was one of the most important cases of that time.
According to this case, a principle was established and it established a legislative enactment. According to this, a state could not interfere in the power of the congress and the power that was talked about in this principle was about interfering with the regulation of the commerce. It was only in the hand of the congress and not with the states.
Answer:
do you still need the answer?
Explanation:
Answer:
1. tells readers important information the characters do not know
dramatic irony
2. hints at what is to come in the action of a story
foreshadowing
3. depicts events that occurred before the events are currently
flashback
4. unfolding in the story
develops the sequence of events in a story
plot
Explanation:
I think b....I did the tutorial
Answer:
The 13th Amendment
Explanation:
United States Constitution provides that "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."
