Answer:
Casey's opportunity cost of producing 1 kg of potatoes is 5 kg of steak.
Casey's opportunity cost of producing 1 kg of steak is 0.2 kg of potatoes.
Rick's opportunity cost of producing 1 kg of potatoes is 3 kg of steak.
Rick's opportunity cost of producing 1 kg of steak is 0.33 kg of potatoes.
Casey should produce steak while Rick should produce potatoes, since Rick has a comparative advantage in producing potatoes (lower opportunity cost) and Casey has a comparative advantage in producing steak.
As long as the price of steak per kilogram of potatoes is less than 5 kg of steak and more than 3 kg of steak, then both would win. In order for both of them to win is a similarly proportional way, the exchange price should be 4 kg of steak per kg of potatoes.
The employing member will have the opportunity to approve or disapprove of the associated person's participation.
“Registered representative” is a term that describes a person who is licensed to shop for and promote securities for customers and is subsidized by using a firm registered with the financial industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).
Independent broker-dealers feature as complete-provider brokerage companies, however, continue to be unfastened from the limitations and demands of a large Wall Street corporation. RIAs are independent fiduciaries who may accomplice with several broker-sellers, promoting a variety of products and services.
Registered representatives constitute customers within the buying and selling of investment merchandise including stocks, bonds, and mutual budgets. Many manage complicated trades or complicated products which can be out of doors the abilities of online trading.
Learn more about Registered representatives here brainly.com/question/26179492
#SPJ4
<span>Absolutely not! We should be investing money in clean, renewable energy and not on dirty fossil fuels that destroy the very same planet we live on. Fossil fuels are aptly named for the present moment in time, because they really are a thing of the past. In short, NO!</span>
Answer:
No, Jim is not correct.
Explanation:
Betty will win this case.
Generally, the law encourages marriage as its policy. If there is any contract that prevent or restrict marriage in whatever way, such contract would be considered null and void because it is against the public policy.
Despite the above, contracts will be generally considered valid when they place reasonable restrictions on marriage. In this question, the restriction placed on Betty that she should get married until after her 22nd birthday is reasonable and has to be considered to be valid. Based on this, Betty has to be paid the $25,000 as laid down in the binding contract between the two parties.
Therefore, Jim is not correct.
