Answer:
Australia has purchasing-power parity with the U.S.
Explanation:
A basket of goods costs $800 in the US. The same basket costs 1,000 euros in France and 960 Australian dollars in Australia.
The nominal exchange rate for euros is .80 euros per U.S. dollar and for Australian dollars, it is 1.2 Australian dollars per U.S. dollar.
The purchasing power parity theory compares the currency of two countries through a basket of goods. The currency of the two countries is in equilibrium or is at par if a basket of goods cost the same in both the countries.
This method compares the economic productivity and standard of living in two countries.
Converting the value of basket in France into US dollars,
= 
= $1,250
Converting the value of basket in Australia into US dollars,
= 
= $800
The cost of the basket of goods is same in Australia. This indicates that Australia has purchasing-power parity with the U.S.
The expenses incurred for keeping goods or inventory in a warehouse are known as inventory holding costs.
<h3 /><h3>What is inventory holding cost?</h3>
- The expenses incurred for keeping goods or inventory in a warehouse are known as inventory holding costs.
- Inventory that is kept on hand is a liability that reduces profit margins and raises operating costs for firms.
- Inventory holding expenses include rent for the facility, security fees, depreciation costs, and insurance.
- To reduce stock-out costs, merchandise is kept on hand.
- To ensure that no consumer leaves empty-handed, all businesses must forecast the demand for their products and maintain inventories of raw materials, finished goods, work-in-progress, and consumables.
- Within a single supply chain, inventory holding costs are computed as a portion of the overall inventory costs.
- Storage, insurance, labor, transportation, depreciation, shrinkage of the inventory, spoilage of the inventory, obsolescence, and opportunity costs are some of the costs.
To Learn more About inventory holding refer to:
brainly.com/question/26533444
#SPJ4
Answer:
The Correct option is <u>"B"</u>
Explanation:
Any person who by arguments verbal or written or by behavior characterize himself, or wittingly documents himself to be drawn, to be a companion in a very secure, is responsible as a companion in this organization to any person who has on the religion of one such illustration specified credit to the organization, whether or not the individual signifying himself or drawn to be a companion will or doesn't understand that the illustration has extended the individual therefore providing credit.
While overuse of fossil fuels will cause pollution, world without them is also difficult. A balance is required.
Explanation:
- Without fossil fuels vehicle transport for conveyance does not happen, food won't be transported, and thus life may come to standstill. It will take sometimes, centuries for the alternative sources to replace fossil fuels.
- Overuse will cause pollution to happen and the fossil fuels getting depleted. We already found that if fossil fuels are not there, world will come to standstill. Therefore, cannot deplete them.
- Balanced usage, usage with caution, and development of alternative sources are the ways to tackle the problem. These are the implications of the statements.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question is option B) decrease.
Explanation:
Regressive tax is that of tax which is imposed in such manner that when the income level in the economy increases , the average tax rate would decrease. This type of tax has heavy burden on the low income people as it takes high proportion of their income. So it can be said here that there is an inverse relationship between tax payer's ability to pay ( which can be measured in income , assets or consumption) and the tax rates imposed.
