Question

Consider the following argument: Suppose the world has a creator like a house does. Now, when houses are not perfect, we know who to blame: the carpenters and masons who created them. But the world is also not wholly perfect. Therefore, it would seem to follow that the Creator of the world is not perfect either. But you would consider this conclusion absurd. The only way to avoid the absurdity, however, is to reject the supposition that leads to it. Therefore, the world does not have a Creator in the way a house does. The premises of the argument include:

Answer 1

Answer:

The premises of the argument include the Reductio ad absurdum fallacy.

Explanation:

The argument shown in the question above can be recognized as a fallacy, as it presents arguments that seem logical, but are completely absurd and establish incorrect reasoning. The fallacy presented in the text above is known as reductio ad absurdum, because it presents premises derived from a sequence of absurd thoughts, reaching a conclusion that cannot be considered as correct.