It helps with communication which is very important
Answer:
The overview of the problem is listed throughout the explanation segment below.
Explanation:
Professionals throughout the field of criminology possess stylistic. Some are much more concerned with making money, and others are more successful in forming equality as well as humanity throughout a social structure.
- Even in the criminal system, where the practitioner is much more motivated by money than it is detrimental to society. From the history of alleged aggression, whenever a criminal law provider attempts to rescue or defend the perpetrator, it becomes very detrimental to society. Furthermore, the intended murder would be against the common interest as well.
- There are indeed instances where even the perpetrators are involved in violence. It is indeed a huge political curse, genuinely. In a somewhat scenario, the law enforcement professional could perhaps take the necessary steps never to operate for both the betterment of people on numerous occasions including its perpetrator.
- There are several other experts in the field of criminology who preserve oppression as well as discrimination. I just want the ones he fears to be disciplined. They occasionally consider taking unethical tactics to do just that. But this is damaging to society. Once again, certain criminology experts are selling profits to either the wealthy. So they're not allowed to do that for the benefit of society.
Answer:
The correct answer would be, Power dynamic of Virtuous Friendship best describes their relationship.
Explanation:
Power dynamics is the interaction of people or a group of people with each other in which one party has more power over the other party. This power could outright people of the other party. Power is the ability to influence other to control the other people behavior.
Now in this example, both friends are practicing virtuous friendship; which shows that both friends are selfless and are completely alright with the choice of the other friend, which describes the bonding of both friends is so firm that they value the decisions of each other a lot and will accept it what other friend will do.
Answer and Explanation:
I carried out the taste test with the members of my family, where everyone, with their eyes closed, had to taste pepsi and coke, tap water and bottled water, a bottle of expensive wine and a bottle of ordinary wine. After drinking from each pair, the participants had to express their considerations about each drink and say which was their favorite.
Regarding Coke vs. Pepsi the result was the most surprising. Among the 10 participants, 6 failed to recognize the products and chose pepsi as the drink that tasted the best. The surprising thing is that these participants had previously informed that they did not like Pepsi, which shows that the visualization of the product interferes with the reception of the product by the consumer.
Regarding tap water and bottled water the result was as expected. All participants showed preferences for bottled water, stating that tap water had a strong flavor from chemicals, such as chlorine, used in it.
Finally, the test with expensive wine and cheap wine had well balanced results and most participants were surprised by the taste of cheap wine, stating that they would drink again without any problem.
I do believe this would be A. I’m so sorry if that’s wrong ..