Explanation:
The abolitionist movement was an organized effort to end the practice of slavery in the United States. The divisiveness and animosity fueled by the movement, along with other factors, led to the Civil War and ultimately the end of slavery in America.The abolitionist movement was the social and political effort to end slavery everywhere. Fueled in part by religious fervor, the movement was led by people like Frederick Douglass, Sojourner Truth and John Brown.Abolitionism in the United States was the movement that sought to end slavery in the United States, and was active both before and during the American Civil War. In the Americas and Western Europe, abolitionism was a movement that sought to end the Atlantic slave trade and to free the slaves.
Answer:
Prejudice
, is the right answer.
Explanation:
Prejudice is an effective sentiment towards an individual based on that individual's recognized group association. The term is generally used to apply to a preconceived, ordinarily unfortunate, evaluation of another individual based on that person's beliefs, values, sex, social class, political affiliation, disability, language, occupation, education or other individual characteristics.
Answer:
Flow-through tax entity
Explanation:
Flow-through tax entity does not record the income from its yearly operation as its net income. This type of organization direct directed those income to the owners, so the taxation laws that applicable for those income is the tax laws for individuals rather than business establishments.
Almost all countries allow this practice, but To prevent frauds, they usually required to file an annual return reporting the shares of income allocated to owners,
Answer: Both revolutions are the result of the struggle for freedom.
Explanation:
Poor population status, the laws of the subject are similarities between the American war for independence and the Syrian civil war. In America, the British forced the population to fight and revolution.
In Syria, Bashar el-Assad, through his bad policies and laws, but the majority of the Syrian people in an awkward position, who rose in despair against the tyranny of the individual. In both cases, the authorities did not take into account the place of the people and their position, which resulted in the uprising.