Answer:
<h3>If only one person has the authority to rule, then no one else, even members of government, may have authority, so divine right undermines civil society.</h3><h3 />
Explanation:
- The statement that best explains an enlightenment position on the divine right to rule is "If only one person has the authority to rule, then no one else, even members of government, may have authority, so divine right undermines civil society."
- If we look from an enlightenment position, authority and power should be derived from reason as it does not believe in divine right theory of power and legitimacy.
- It believes that rights and liberties of the people are infringed upon and other forms of rational democratic processes are undermined when only one person takes control over the whole power.
Answer:
#Carry on Learning
#Hope it helps
#Pa-brainliest
#And correct me if I'm wrong
The correct answer is <span>Lincoln did not want armed conflict at Fort Sumter, but Davis acted quickly to cripple Union forces.
</span>
In the fort Sumter situation, Lincoln did not want an armed conflict and was against there being fighting over the fort. Lincoln wanted to avoid the war completely and preserve the union but this wasn't possible because the states that seceded initiated the war first with their secession and then with the attack on the Fort.
Jefferson Davis on the other hand couldn't care less about about those in the Fort and wanted to find a quick way to cripple the armies of the North and do it fast so that they didn't have a way to recuperate from it or to retaliate. He believed that with such a move he would dissuade the Union from waging wars and would leave them be out of fear.
