Answer:
I will take $36,230.5 to pay for the education of child.
Explanation:
Cash Invested in the saving account will earn a return of 8% each year and this amount could be withdrawn by the me to pay for the education of child.
We will use following formula to calculate the annual payments
P = r ( PV ) / [ 1 - ( 1+ r )^-n ]
where
PV = amount of investment = $120,000
r = rate of return = 8%
n = number of period = 4 years
P = 8% ( 120,000 ) / [ 1 - ( 1 + 0.08 )^-4 ]
P = 36,230.5
Answer:
Total cost= $60,800
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
For 4,000 units:
Unitary variable cost= $8
Unitary fixed cost= $5
<u>First, we need to calculate the total fixed cost:</u>
Total fixed cost= 5*4,000= $20,000
<u>Now, we can determine the total cost for 5,100 units:</u>
Total cost= 5,100*8 + 20,000
Total cost= $60,800
Answer:
The answer is D) None of these statement is relevant in the decision to further process the cream into butter.
Explanation:
option A) the amount paid to the farmers to purchase the unprocessed milk: this information is not relevant to further develop the cream and low fat milk to butter. It was already considered before this stage of production.
Option B) the cost of breaking down the unprocessed milk into cream and low-fat milk: this cost was already accounted for since the processing into cream and low fat milk is completed.
Option C) the portion of corporate fixed expenses that are currently being allocated to cream: This information is not going to help in the decision making for further processing.
Answer:
Explanation:
Yes, Disparate Impact Theory can be used in this case relating to the processes of subjective selection such as interrogations. If a discriminatory workplace practice has an unfair and aggressive impact on minorities, it may be in violation of Title VII. Professional individual employees who support on the basis of discretionary judgments without intending to do so are engaging in biased conduct.
The case of Watson V. Fort Worth Bank & Trust will be used to support my claim. Clara Watson turned down a promotion that was contingent on an interview under this scenario.
The U.s. Supreme Court Declared that a Title VII claim to a strategy of subjection enforcement can only be investigated under the unequal care principle. In the majority decision, the Court allowed the principle of (disparate effects) to apply to arbitrarily defined work practices.
Where is the link? I do not see the link in the comments
