Well a hypothesis is guess about an experiment and how it works or is preformed. If your supporting one then you agree with how its done and how it works and you got good results. If you fail a hypothesis that means you most likely tried and didn't succeed or didn't get the results you wanted. Sorry if this is confusing the question kinda confused me.
Answer:
The structure of the cell is very much linked with the functions of the cell.The cardiac muscle is made of myocardium which serves the body by providing the blood, nutrients and oxygen.The cardiac muscles appears stripped when seen under microscope.
The skin consists of the tissues and cells which are close enough to create a boundary which does not allows the entry of materials and pathogens inside the body.
Hence, the function and the morphology of the cells are somewhere related to each other.
Answer:
The original water sample contains 830,000 cells per milliliter.
Explanation:
A sample of well water is tested for its bacterial content in a plate count assay. A one-milliliter sample of the water is diluted in a 1:10 dilution series. One milliliter of the fourth dilution tube is plated in a pour plate. After incubation, the plate has 83 colonies, indicating that the original water sample contained 830,000 cells per milliliter.
Answer:
- gas
- liquid
Explanation:
Part of the definition of gases and liquids is the ability to flow, so this answers your question.
Why does this not apply to solids? The cells in a solid are closer together with less room for movement, so they do not "flow" like gasses or liquids. You can think of the device you are asking this question on versus the water in the ocean.
<u>Note</u>: Gas can still flow, but it does not flow the same as water. It depends on what you are being taught for if gas flows or not.
-> Liquid flows from high to low only, while gas can flow in all directions
Have a nice day!
I hope this is what you are looking for, but if not - comment! I will edit and update my answer accordingly. (ノ^∇^)
★ Also please leave the rating you think I deserve (It helps other users as well as myself)
- Heather
Answer:
For many centuries, smallpox devastated mankind. In modern times we do not have to worry about it thanks to the remarkable work of Edward Jenner and later developments from his endeavors. With the rapid pace of vaccine development in recent decades, the historic origins of immunization are often forgotten. Unfortunately, since the attack on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, the threat of biological warfare and bioterrorism has reemerged. Smallpox has been identified as a possible agent of bioterrorism (1). It seems prudent to review the history of a disease known to few people in the 21st century.
Edward Jenner is well known around the world for his innovative contribution to immunization and the ultimate eradication of smallpox (2). Jenner's work is widely regarded as the foundation of immunology—despite the fact that he was neither the first to suggest that infection with cowpox conferred specific immunity to smallpox nor the first to attempt cowpox inoculation for this purpose.
Explanation:
