Which shows P = 2a + 2b + c solved for c?

A red apple has mass of 20 grams .you cut it into 5 slices. what about the aplles has changed ?

Nutka1998 [239]

Well you have cut it into smaller pieces so it would be I guess 4 grams now because 20 divided by 5 is 4.

7 0

3 years ago

Pls help me solve it!

vekshin1

Answer:

A= 40°

B= 35°

C= 15°

Step-by-step explanation:

Since it says if the triangles were accurately drawn, then A would be the same degree as Q. C would be the same degree as P. B would be the same degree as R. Since R's degree is missing I knew that a obtuse triangle was 90°. I added 40+15 and got 55. Then i subtracted 90-55 and got 35. So the unknown value would be 35°.

I hope this helps.

3 0

3 years ago

A recent study found that 51 children who watched a commercial for Walker Crisps (potato chips) featuring a long-standing sports

hichkok12 [17]

Answer:

1

The claim is that the mean amount of Walker Crisps eaten was significantly higher for the children who watched the sports celebrity- endorsed Walker Crisps commercial

2

The kind of test to use is a t -test because a t -test is used to check if there is a difference between means of a population

3

$t = 3.054$

4

The p-value is $p-value = P(Z > 3.054) = 0.0011291$

5

The conclusion is

There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean amount of Walker Crisps eaten was significantly higher for the children who watched the sports celebrity- endorsed Walker Crisps commercial

The test statistics is

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

The first sample size is $n_1 = 51$

The first sample mean is $\mu_1 = 36$

The second sample size is $n_2 = 41$

The second sample size is $\mu_2 = 25$

The first standard deviation is $\sigma _1 = 21.4 \ g$

The second standard deviation is $\sigma _2 = 12.8 \ g$

The level of significance is $\alpha = 0.05$

The null hypothesis is $H_o : \mu_1 = \mu_ 2$

The alternative hypothesis is $H_a : \mu_1 > \mu_2$

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

$t = \frac{\= x_1 - \= x_2}{ \sqrt{ \frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2} } }$

=> $t = \frac{ 36 - 25}{ \sqrt{ \frac{ 21.4^2}{51} + \frac{ 12.8^2}{41} } }$

=> $t = 3.054$

The p-value is mathematically represented as

$p-value = P(Z > 3.054)$

Generally from the z table

$P(Z > 3.054) = 0.0011291$

=> $p-value = P(Z > 3.054) = 0.0011291$

From the values obtained we see that $p-value < \alpha$ so the null hypothesis is rejected

Thus the conclusion is

There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean amount of Walker Crisps eaten was significantly higher for the children who watched the sports celebrity- endorsed Walker Crisps commercial

5 0

3 years ago

Saydi is buying a pair of jeans that regularly cost $60. They are on sale for 40% off. If the tax rate is 9%,what is the sale pr

Karo-lina-s [1.5K]

Answer:

$39.24

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's determine the sale price before tax:

0.40($60) = $24 is the discount, so

the sale price is $60 - $24, or $36.

Multiplying this result by 1.09 results in the total price, including tax. It is $39.24.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A real estate agent has 14 properties that she shows. She feels that there is a 50% chance of selling any one property during a

Ratling [72]

Answer:

91.02% probability of selling more than 4 properties in one week.

Step-by-step explanation:

For each property, there are only two possible outcomes. Either it is sold, or it is not. The chance of selling any one property is independent of selling another property. So we use the binomial probability distribution to solve this question.

Binomial probability distribution

The binomial probability is the probability of exactly x successes on n repeated trials, and X can only have two outcomes.

$P(X = x) = C_{n,x}.p^{x}.(1-p)^{n-x}$