Answer: Malcolm X was a symbol of the fight against racism and discrimination.
Explanation:
Malcolm X was born in 1925. As a boy, he lost his father, who was killed by racists. His father was a group that sought to better position African-Americans. His father's death was characterized as an accident and if the evidence suggested murder. His mother became ill afterwards, and the unhappy Malcolm ends up in a home at the age of 12. Malcolm later moves to his cousin's house in New York, where he begins to deal with crime. Soon he ended up in prison, and that is where his life completely changed. Malcolm spent most of his time in the library.
After leaving prison, he joined the group "Nation of Islam" and renounced his surname "Little" which symbolized slavery and changed his surname to X. With his charisma and rhetoric he stood out in the fight against racism and discrimination. Malcolm X was killed in 1965 after leaving the "Nation of Islam" group, and it was the members of this group who died Malcolm. He remained remembered as a human rights activist, the leader of the black Muslims of America of that period.
Answer: by replacing somebody of the workers for machines
Explanation:
Source Credibility in Tobacco Control Messaging
Objectives
Perceived credibility of a message’s source can affect persuasion. This paper reviews how beliefs about the source of tobacco control messages may encourage attitude and behavior change.
Methods
We conducted a series of searches of the peer-reviewed literature using terms from communication and public health fields. We reviewed research on source credibility, its underlying concepts, and its relation to the persuasiveness of tobacco control messages.
Results
We recommend an agenda for future research to bridge the gaps between communication literature on source credibility and tobacco control research. Our recommendations are to study the impact of source credibility on persuasion with long-term behavior change outcomes, in different populations and demographic groups, by developing new credibility measures that are topic- and organization-specific, by measuring how credibility operates across media platforms, and by identifying factors that enhance credibility and persuasion.
Conclusions
This manuscript reviews the state of research on source credibility and identifies gaps that are maximally relevant to tobacco control communication. Knowing first whether a source is perceived as credible, and second, how to enhance perceived credibility, can inform the development of future tobacco control campaigns and regulatory communications.
