The answer is A my friend.
Answer:
Dulce and Luis buy some fruit at the market. Dulce buys 5 cartons of blueberries for a total cost of $13.75. At this
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
(a) There are asymptotes at x=3/2 and x=-1/3
Step-by-step explanation:
The denominator zeros can be found by factoring:
f(x) = (x +1)/((2x -3)(3x +1))
Neither of the denominator factors is cancelled by the numerator factor, so each represents a vertical asyptote, not a function hole.
The asymptotes are at the values of x where the denominator is zero:
2x -3 = 0 ⇒ x = 3/2
3x +1 = 0 ⇒ x = -1/3
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
