Answer:
POLLINATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Explanation:
Answer:
D. Most music groups are made of 3 or more persons
Explanation:
It is quite uncommon to find that there are less than three persons in any music group. Although it is possible, the number of groups with less than three persons are quite less than the number of groups that are more.
By implementing this law that there can only be three people or less in the group does not decrease the amount of noise that is made but it does decrease the frequency that the noise is made.
This implementation will see fewer groups and reduced noise overall. However when the noise is made it is very likely that it will be just as loud as a band with more than three persons.
Answer: John Deere made a new steel plow to make turning the prairies into farmland much easier.
Explanation:
The climate of the Midwest Region enhances its farming as it has a good climate and also, the region has a fertile, and deep soil made up of vital nutrients for the crops that are planted. Some of the crops that were cultivated include corn, squash, sunflowers, beans, sweet potatoes, etc.
A positive development of early farming in the Midwest was that John Deere made a new steel plow to make turning the prairies into farmland much easier. This was vital as it was used in the breaking down of tough soil
Answer: Mental map of reality
Explanation:
Mental map of reality is a personal view perception of an area of interaction. This describes the concept of race as signifying human difference.
There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
