Answer:
$9.75
Step-by-step explanation:
We have all we need to solve for Bag #3.
2 bags equal $6.50.
We want 3 bags, not 4. So we need to divide the original cost by 1/2.
$6.50 divided by 1/2 is $3.25
Now we add an additional $3.25 to the original $6.50
Answer:
-2
Step-by-step explanation:
If you substitute x for 4, you have -4+2 to get -2.
Step-by-step explanation:
1/625×15625
We wil add power 2 as shown in the bracket
It will be 1/390625×244140625=625
Looks like the PMF is supposed to be

which is kinda weird, but it's not entirely clear what you meant...
Anyway, assuming the PMF above, for this to be a valid PMF, we need the probabilities of all events to sum to 1:

Next,





If

, then

, where we take the positive root because we know

can only take on positive values, namely 1, 2, and 5. Correspondingly, we know that

can take on the values

,

, and

. At these values of

, we would have the same probability as we did for the respective value of

. That is,

Part (5) is incomplete, so I'll stop here.
Answer:
The data are at the
<u>Nominal</u> level of measurement.
The given calculation is wrong because average (mean) cannot be calculated for nominal level of measurement.
Step-by-step explanation:
The objective here is to Identify the level of measurement of the data, and explain what is wrong with the given calculation.
a)
The data are at the <u> Nominal </u> level of measurement due to the fact that it portrays the qualitative levels of naming and representing different hierarchies from 100 basketball, 200 basketball, 300 football, 400 anything else
b) We are being informed that, the average (mean) is calculated for 597 respondents and the result is 256.1.
The given calculation is wrong because average (mean) cannot be calculated for nominal level of measurement. At nominal level this type of data set do not measure at all , it is not significant to compute their average (mean).