<span>The California high-speed rail is such a groundbreaking effort because it helps with the environment and makes it cleaner. </span>
Answer:
c) Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors may interfere with DNA replication by the host, not just by the virus.
Explanation:
A drug that targets the structures or processes specific to the pathogen or microbe has fewer side effects than the drugs that target the more general structures and processes exhibited by both the pathogen and host cells.
According to the given information, the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors resemble thymine and terminate the process of DNA replication. Thymine base is also one of the nitrogenous bases present in the human cells and other organisms. Therefore, the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors would terminate the process of DNA replication in both the virus and the host organism.
On the other hand, the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors specifically target the reverse transcriptase enzyme that is not present in host organisms. Therefore, the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors have fewer side effects than the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.
Answer:
up-regulation
Explanation:
Upregulation is where a increases the quantity of a cellular component like protein or RNA in response to an external stimulus.By controlling the number of its receptors, cells may increase and decrease their cell sensitivity.... Hormones can also trigger cells to control themselves by upregulation.( Estrogen is the primary sex hormone for females).
Answer:
A vascular plant is any one of a number of plants with specialized vascular tissue. The two types of vascular tissue, xylem and phloem, are responsible for moving water, minerals, and the products of photosynthesis throughout the plant. As opposed to a non-vascular plant, a vascular plant can grow much larger.
Explanation:
From anecdotes he heard, Edward Jenner came up with the premise and conclusion that dairy maids could not get small pox because they had previously been exposed to the virus.
<h3>
What was conclusion of Edward jenner in case of small pox?</h3>
He also came to the conclusion that small pox may be passed from one person to the next. Edward Jenner came to this conclusion based on stories he had heard about dairy maids being immune to smallpox.
In 1736, Edward Jenner met Sarah Nelms, a young dairy girl with small pox lesions. Edward Jenner then vaccinated an 8-year-old kid named James Phipps with material from Nelms' small pox lesion. James Phipps suffered a fever and became unwell, but he recovered completely after ten days.
Jenner infected the same boy with materials from a fresh small pox lesion a month later. There was no sickness in the boy.
When Edward Jenner was inoculated/vaccinated with matter from a small pox lesion, he came to the conclusion that he could acquire total protection from small pox.
For more information regarding small pox, visit:
brainly.com/question/15524204
#SPJ1
