Answer:
The correct answer is option (a) The court probably found that the state law was unconstitutional under the supremacy cause.
Explanation:
Solution
From the given questions it states that, What would be the court's most likely response to Ralph's lawsuit.
The court's decision response would be that, I that when the situation arises or occurs in that case, where there is a conflict which arises between federal and state law then in that case federal law must be applied.
Answer: Yes contract has been formed.
Explanation: According to the Uniform Electronic Transaction Act (UETA), electronic transactions are just as binding as transactions made on hardcopy documents. Moreover signatures made electronically reinforces the validity of these elctronic documents.
In the scenario the actual signature was signed on a hard copy by the seller, but it was then faxed back to the listing agent. This faxed copy, showing the faxed signature, is an electronic document that confirms the existence of the contract in accordance with the UETA. This faxed signature is as enforceable as an ink signature.
Answer:
a. business
Explanation:
The opening is the beginning of the message.
The closing is the end of the message.
I hope my answer helps you
I’ll say it’s A
But I think it’s C
It’s gonna be either A or C
<h2>meet with Chad in person and establish goals for improvement.</h2>
Explanation:
- Whenever an employee shows negativity either to his co-employee or to sub-ordinates, it is better to call in person and meet.
- We can get the pointers which is making that particular employee to behave in such a manner or we can otherwise guide that employee in the right direction so that the organizational goals are met.
Following things will not work:
- Discussing about the poor performance of Chad's with other managers
- Sending an e-mail stating the poor performance of Chad's to all the employees.
- Warning Chad's coworker is not a good solution, because here Chad's behavior towards co-workers are wrong and not vice versa.
