1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
HACTEHA [7]
3 years ago
15

If you think anything from your vehicle Check just could affect your safety or ability to control your car , you should

Law
1 answer:
irakobra [83]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Tell your automobile dealer, or go to an auto-parts store. Ask an expert, basically. Don't go online and try to do anything yourself, because you could just be putting yourself in more danger.

Can I get a thanks and a brainliest please?

You might be interested in
What could happen if the police ask your name and you refuse to tell them or give them a false name?
Ksivusya [100]

Answer:

go to jail

Explanation:

If you refuse a Breathalyzer test, you will most likely face serious consequences. For instance, if an officer stops you and believes you are intoxicated, and you refuse to submit to a test to determine your blood-alcohol concentration (BAC), you may risk having your license suspended or even face jail time.

While you may not be under arrest at this point, refusing a Breathalyzer may not be such a great idea as prosecutors may still base a potential DUI/DWI charge on other evidence collected at the scene, including officer observations, witness testimony, or the results of a field sobriety test. In certain jurisdictions, your refusal may be used against you in any possible trial. And some state laws distinguish between refusing a mobile Breathalyzer (which can carry a small penalty) and refusing a post-arrest blood, urine, or breath test at a police station or hospital (which can result in more severe penalties).

8 0
3 years ago
What is the "first consideration" for policymakers?
8090 [49]
<h3>What is the "first consideration" for policymakers?</h3>

<em>Answer</em><em>;</em><em> </em>

<h3>Lavis JN, Gilbert R, Salanti G, Harden M, See S. Infant sleeping position and the sudden infant death syndrome: systematic review of observational studies and historical review of recommendations from 1940 to 2002. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34:874–87. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyi08</h3>

<h3><em>Hope</em><em> </em><em>it's</em><em> </em><em>helpful</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>you</em></h3>
4 0
3 years ago
What was the main goal of early American city police
sertanlavr [38]

Answer:

Like the Metropolitan police American police where organized in a quasi-milatary command structure. There main task was the prevention of crime and disorder, and they provide a wide array of other public services.

4 0
3 years ago
Once a court determines that a waiver is appropriate in a particular case, what happens to the defendant?
Volgvan

Answer:

"Standard 15- 1.2. Waiver of trial by jury

(a) Cases required to be tried by jury should be so tried, unless jury trial is waived with the consent of the prosecutor.

(b) The court should not accept a waiver unless the defendant, after being advised by the court of his or her right to trial by jury and the consequences of waiver of jury trial, personally waives the right to trial by jury in writing or in open court on the record.

(c) A defendant may not withdraw a voluntary and knowing waiver as a matter of right, but the court, in its discretion, may permit withdrawal prior to the commencement of the trial.

(d) A defendant may withdraw a waiver of jury trial as a matter of right, and a prosecutor may withdraw consent to a waiver as a matter of right if there is a change in the trial judge.

Standard 15- 1.3. Waiver of full jury or of unanimous verdict*

(a) At any time before verdict, the parties, with the approval of the court, may stipulate that the jury shall consist of any number less than that required for a full jury.

(b) At any time before verdict, the parties, with the approval of the court, may stipulate that the verdict may be less than unanimous. The stipulation should be clear as to the number of concurring jurors required for the verdict to be valid.

(c) The court should not accept such a stipulation unless the defendant, after being advised by the court of his or her right to trial by a full jury, personally waives the right to trial by a full jury, or the right to a unanimous verdict, in open court on the record."

Explanation:

8 0
4 years ago
French Francois Emanuel Fodéré wrote one of the earliest scientific treatises on
kotegsom [21]

Francois Emanuel Fodere wrote the treatise titled a treatise on Forensic Medicine and Public Health.

Francoise was from France. He was a French forensic physician. He made ground breaking achievements in the use of science to enforce criminal and civil laws.

This treatise was written in the year 1789. It was the first of it's kind. It has helped to make discoveries on the cause of death and manner in which a person died

Read more on brainly.com/question/18960271?referrer=searchResults

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain why it is sometimes nessessery to limit rights
    10·1 answer
  • Parole officers are responsible for monitoring the activities of parolees; offenders recently released from prison. Traditionall
    13·1 answer
  • Which statement describes a difference between authoritarian government
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following statemeants is true about payday loans
    12·1 answer
  • Create a list of the 10 most deviant acts you can imagine.
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following individual is NOT considered a U.S. citizen?
    12·1 answer
  • What can the criminal justice system do to better prepare for future terrorist incidents?
    11·1 answer
  • Do you support a second impeachment trial?
    12·2 answers
  • Charles wants to invest his money in something that earns money steadily
    12·1 answer
  • What is the primary responsibility of United States Attorneys?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!