Answer:
A. The trade-off a firm faces when using retained earnings or borrowed funds is the same.
Explanation:
- A trade-off is based on the situational decisions that usually involve the loss of quality and a property that is set or designed to give a return in the other aspects.
- As one part has to increase and the other has to decrease. The trade-off is commonly expressed as in the terms of opportunity costs which states the loss of the best alternative.
The answer to this question is the "WAIT-LIST CONTROL". When a researcher is examining the effects of an experimental surgery on epilepsy randomly assigns epileptic patients to three different conditions. The first condition is that the participants receive the surgery. The second condition is that the patients receive the medication while third condition, the patients receive the surgery one month after the other group of patients. The third group of patients who need to wait for another one month is in the WAIT-LIST CONTROL and can only be accommodated after the other group is done.
Answer:
1. $13,500
2. $13,500
3. $336,500
Explanation:
1. Bad debt expense:
= Sales × Percent of sales uncollectible
= $900,000 × 1.5%
= $13,500
Therefore, the bad debt expense for the year 2019 is $13,500.
2. Allowance for Doubtful accounts = $13,500
3. For the end of 2019, what is the company's net realizable value:
= Accounts receivable - Allowance for Doubtful accounts
= $350,000 - $13,500
= $336,500
Answer:
all of the above
Explanation:
All of these represent features of evidence-based practice (EBP). It is now common for insurance companies to adjust the services they will pay for based on EBP guidelines.
Answer:
The answer is B. Ethan has more experience than Karen.
Explanation:
Now, lets take each Answer option separately and see why only B is correct.
Option A is no longer legally accepted or ethical. Perhaps during the era of segregation back in 1960s' this option could have been acceptable. But today it is illegal and is considered as a violation of basic human rights.
Option C is not correct as well because although people with special needs and physical requirements are entitled to receive certain special treatments, paying them more solely based on their disability is not considered suitable nor ethical.
Option D is unacceptable. No one can assume that men have more stamina than women. There are competent, strong and qualified women who can do their jobs much better than men. So we cannot accept this as an answer.
Option E is incorrect as well. Although a person could be an immigrant, once that person has lawfully taken the citizenship of a country, that "immigrant" is considered as a "citizen" of that country (this is not applicable for illegal immigrants!).
However, we can take option B as the answer. This is because when comparing a new employee with a more experienced employee, we can't see any problem in paying the experienced employee more.