Answer:
Historians are always finding new pieces of evidence to change interpretations
Explanation:
If a historian were to find something on the Pyramids of Giza 10 years ago and made the assumption that "The Pyramids were built for people", a new piece of evidence recently found could change that, and see that "The Pyramids were built for gods"
(I don't know if this assumption about the Pyramids is true, I just thought of the first thing in mind)
The correct answer is C) <span> Its central location gave Muslim traders access to both land and sea routes between Europe and Asia.
</span>
Sir, their are no choices to your question so, therefore, I am unable to answer it.
<em>Ghengis Khan and his Mongol armies rose to power at the end of the twelfth century, at a moment when few opposing rulers could put up much resistance to them. The vast Mongol empire he created stretched from China to Europe, across which the Silk Routes functioned as efficient lines of communication as well as trade.</em>
<em>Hey</em><em> </em><em>Mate</em><em>!</em><em>!</em><em>!</em><em>!</em><em>!</em><em>!</em><em>!</em><em> </em><em>I</em><em> </em><em>hope</em><em> </em><em>this</em><em> </em><em>was</em><em> </em><em>helpful</em><em> </em><em>if</em><em> </em><em>yes</em><em> </em><em>please</em><em> </em><em>mark</em><em> </em><em>me</em><em> </em><em>brainliest</em><em>. </em>
So the geography was mostly mountains and they didn't want to have to climb over them to get west because they were pretty much lazy bums
