I believe television is more effective than radio because, television provide a visual image of certain things, and people find visuals more appealing and favorite more than listening to someone speaking. The images tend to capture the mind of the viewer causing them to be more attracted to a certain thing, causing it to have a greater influence on public opinion. For example, If Pepsi chose to create an advertisement in a radio by just simply stating that it's refreshing and saying that you should buy it. But Coca Cola chose to make an ad on TV by showing people enjoying the drink by the pool in a summer day, you are more likely to chose Coke because it appealed to you more than Pepsi. So I think that's why Television is more effective in influencing public opinion than a radio.
Hope this helps you
Answer: B) Yes, especially if the people who are on a do dash not dash call registry have a trait that is not accurately represented by the remaining people in the sample
If the person conducting the survey wants a good random sample then they should take opinions from a broad audience, including people from different backgrounds, races, ages, cultures etc. In this case, the people that are not on the call registry most likely have a common trait that would explain why they're not in there (ie. they're too young to be eligible to be in the call registry, they are too old to be on the call registry, etc). Not calling them then would throw off the sample. Because of this, B is the correct answer.
Answer:
Insight #1: Asia’s consumers know what they want, and they want it now
Asian consumers make decisions quickly. In Vietnam and Thailand, 97% of smartphone users say that online research has contributed to them making purchase decisions more quickly now than they did a few years ago And consumers’ decisions aren’t just faster, they’re also better informed. A staggering 96% of smartphone users in India say that, thanks to online research, they’re making more informed purchase decisions than a few years ago. This is compared to just 59% of people in the U.S. who feel the same Insight #2: In Asia, brand loyalty is built moment-by-moment
Asia Pacific’s mobile-first consumers are open to new brands, which is exciting news for marketers. The key is being there. In Japan, 96% of smartphone users said they aren’t absolutely certain of the specific brand they want to buy when they begin looking for information online,When consumers start searching, they’re all ears.
Even when consumers do have a particular brand in mind, seeing the right information at the right time can make them change their decision. We found that 80% of smartphone users in Hong Kong have actually purchased a brand they wouldn’t normally consider because of relevant information shown to them on their smartphones in those moments. By contrast, only 1 in 3 of U.S. consumers say this.
Marketer takeaway: Be there. Asia Pacific consumers are open to brands across all stages of the consumer journey, but they can’t choose you if you aren’t there. It’s simple: commit to being there in consumers’ moments of need by showing up in category-relevant searches on mobile.
Explanation:
Answer:
Option D
Explanation:
Subsistence farming is a farming practice by individuals for their own use, growing farm produce, crops for sustenance. Practicing this type of farming is not tax exempt, they also pay regular taxes to the farming agency.
Terrence and his family are practicing this type of farming because they only grow enough to feed themselves and pay their taxes to the government. This is know has Subsistence farming.
