Answer:
a, b, c, and d. true
Explanation:
Policy enforcement has to do with the categorization, management and monitoring of a specific set of goals or policies to see if they are been followed/applied. Challenges to policy enforcement are;
1. poorly written policies that results in poor comprehension of the policy
2. failure to report infractions as a result of the new policies
3. lack of involvement in enforcement of key departments and management
4. lack of clearly defined roles and responsibilities
In 2013, the Supreme Court made a ruling in the Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin case that the college must show compelling evidence that racial preferences are justified as one of the admissions criteria.
<h3>In Davis v. UT Austin, what decision did the Supreme Court make?</h3>
In Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin (Fisher), the U.S. Supreme Court (the "Court") decided on June 23, 2016, by a vote of 4-3 that the university's race-conscious admissions policy complied with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In its 2013 decision in Davis v. Texas, which remanded the case to the Fifth Circuit, the Supreme Court set high requirements for affirmative action policies, saying that colleges could only take race into account when making admissions decisions if they could provide a "reasoned, principled explanation" for wanting a diverse student body.
To know more about University of Texas refer to: brainly.com/question/2437326
#SPJ4
Yo tengo mucho dinero.
Yo no tengo suficiente dinero.
Answer:
<em>The concept of "Human Nature" is the believe that there are some naturally existing ways that human naturally think, feel and act</em>. The idea is that some of these attribute are innate to the human species and that it defines humanity and what it means to be human. However, some of the challenges put forward by anti-fundamentalists like the philosopher David L. Hull is<em> the temporal and contingent rarity of this "essential sameness of human being" in biology</em>. Other scientific basis of the inherent human behavior like <em>Instinctual behavior and other complex behavior as observed has also been known to be malleable and not fixed as opposed to the fundamentalist that argue that this inner human nature is the same and fixed</em>.
Yes, I do agree with the challenges.
I agree with this challenges from the fact that the idea of what it means to be human is diverse and different across culture, people and even the individual. <em>Some culture promote and encourage hostility as a way of defending and expanding itself, while others see this act as inhumane</em>, and some people do not see themselves as deviants because of their believe that they are exercising their human nature. some other basis is upbringing. <em>A child isolated from the rest of the world and groomed into a specific nature will retain that nature, which shouldn't be so if the internal human natures exists and is as dominant as fundamentalists of this idea claim.</em>
