Answer:
I think so buh I’d advice u to make it its correct
The parol evidence rule has many exceptions, with possibly the most prevalent one being when <u>oral</u> evidence serves to clear up a(n) <u>ambiguous</u> part of an agreement.
More about the parol evidence rule:
The parol evidence rule is a principle of Anglo-American common law that controls the types of evidence that parties to a contract dispute may provide in an effort to ascertain the precise terms of the contract.
The parol evidence rule also prohibits parties who have reduced their agreement to a finalized written instrument from adding further evidence later on as proof of a different intent regarding the contract terms, such as the content of oral exchanges from earlier in the negotiation process.
Learn more about the parol evidence rule here:
brainly.com/question/15733971
#SPJ4
Answer and Explanation:
Arguments for U.S. Company offshoring:
1. Cost savings:
Companies usually offshore manufacturing or services to developing countries where wages are low, thus resulting in cost savings. These savings are passed on to the customers, shareholders and managers of these companies.
2. Skills:
The competitive advantage of nations often means that some countries or regions develop a much better ecosystem for certain types of industries. This means there is better availability of skilled human resources in that region for specific types of tasks. For example, India and the Philippines have a large pool of English-speaking, college educated youth; as well as a mature training infrastructure; that makes it ideal for business process outsourcing. Therefore, many companies choose to offshore certain business functions (e.g. call centers for customer support) to these locations.
Arguments for U.S. Company offshoring:
1. Quality Control:
While companies can set quality standards for work performed by foreign employees, language and cultural barriers, as well as overseas supply chains, can present barriers to quality control. Products made overseas can be flawed because of out-of-date or worn equipment in overseas factories, or substandard raw materials. In 2000, for example, Masterlock had to recall more than 750,000 locks made in China. Worn dies at the Chinese factory produced locks that could be pulled apart without a key.
2. Public Image:
In times of high unemployment in the United States, sending jobs out of the country can hurt a company’s public image. Fewer regulations in other countries can make it less expensive for American factories to operate, but environmental damage and labor abuses that make the news can tarnish the image of companies involved there. Consumers have organized boycotts against companies that use child labor or sweatshops to produce clothing and shoes. In response, companies such as Nike, Dell and Gap have established codes of conduct for their suppliers.
All variable costs s<span>hould be subtracted from the sales price per unit to compute the unit contribution margin.</span>
First-Look Analysis for Hospital Outlier Monitoring (FATHOM) is a hospital payment monitoring program that contains hospital-specific administrative claims data for a number of CMS-identified problem areas to compare their performance with that of other hospitals.
A Microsoft Access program called FATHOM: First-Look Analysis Tool for Hospital Outlier Monitoring enables CMS to give each State hospital-specific Medicare claims data statistics that show regions with a high payment mistake rate. These target area data act as proxies for payment mistake rates.
An observation that differs greatly from the other data in its set is considered an outlier. To find these entries, an auditor will use a variety of methods, procedures, and tools. Data mining is one such tool that the auditor might use to evaluate information.
Learn more about FATHOM here brainly.com/question/992297
#SPJ4
