Answer: 9.09% ownership
Explanation:
Your current ownership of the shares in Webster Mills is 10% of 3 million.
That means that you own,
= 10% * 3 million
= 300,000 shares.
The new offering that the company is doing equates one right to each share of existing stock and is expected to raise $12 million in new financing at a cost of $40. The goal is to find out how many new shares this will add.
= 12,000,000/40
= 300,000 shares
This means that 300,000 new shares will be added.
There are already 3,000,000 shares outstanding and now there are 300,00 extra which would bring the total to,
= 3,000,000 + 300,000
= 3,300,000 outstanding shares.
Since you sold your rights then you still have shares but now your percentage of ownership will change because of the increase in outstanding shares.
Your ownership percentage is now,
= 300,000 shares (that you own) / 3,300,000 (new outstanding balance)
= 0.0909
= 9.09%
Your new ownership position is that you own 9.09% of Webster Mills.
Answer:
$8750.87
Explanation:
This is compound interest problem. The formula used to solve this would be:
Where
F is the future value (what we want, after 3 years)
P is the initial value (given 6900)
r is the rate of interest per period
here, 8% per year, so 8/4 = 2% per period (since compounded per quarter)
t is the time (3 years and compounding per year so times of compounding is 3*4 = 12), so t = 12
Substituting, we get our answer:
<u>There will be about $8750.87 at the account at the end of 3 years!</u>
The instrument that Shawn must use is “payable to the order of” before the name of the payee.
<h3>Requirements of Negotiability </h3>
- The first of the four major considerations is whether or not a paper is negotiable, and it is one that nonlawyers must address.
- Auditors, retailers, and financial institutions frequently handle notes and checks and must make quick decisions about negotiability.
- In a negotiable instrument, the only permissible promise or direction is to pay a particular sum of money. Any other promise or command renders negotiability null and void
- This restriction exists to prohibit an instrument from having an uncertain value.
- If the bearer of a negotiable instrument had to examine whether a provision or condition had been met before the thing had any value, the utility of the object as a substitute for money would be severely diminished.
Hence, the instrument that Shawn must use is “payable to the order of” before the name of the payee.
To learn more about the Negotiation instrument refer to:
brainly.com/question/9312091
#SPJ4
You're correct. Because the definition of a franchise business is "<span>A </span>franchise<span> is a </span>business system<span> in which </span>private<span> entrepreneurs </span>purchase the rights<span> to open and </span>run<span> a </span>location of a larger company<span>."</span>
<u>Answer: </u>Option 2 discretionary
<u>Explanation:</u>
Spending can be mandatory spending or discretionary spending. Mandatory spending means the spending on essentials goods such as food. Discretionary spending means the spending on recreation and entertainment where people have additional money in hand after meeting their necessary expenses.
In this speech Obama speaks about the non essential expenses when they are controlled more investments can be made. He says when all the departments cut down their discretionary expenses then can result in economic growth.
