Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Step-by-step explanation:
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
Answer:
Chuck must be less than $260,000
Explanation:
The economic decision rule is: Do it if that marginal benefit exceeds the marginal cost and Since Chuck was unwilling to purchase the house at $260,000, we can deduce that the marginal benefit of purchasing the house must be less than $260,000 due to the fact that the seller turns down the offer but says she will sell the house for $260,000.
Answer:
The answer is: Alais will prevail because of material breach of the contract
Explanation:
Material breach in contract law refers to one party failing to perform under the contract significantly enough so that the aggrieved party has the right to sue for breach of contract.
In this case when Rutherford failed to perform, Alais sustained enough "damage" that enables her to sue Rutherford. She probably was no longer able to finish her job in time.
Answer:
Option ( b ) $57,000
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Net income = $300,000
W-2 wages = $120,000
Assets with unadjusted basis = $75,000
Taxable income before the QBI deduction = $285,000
Now,
The QBI deduction for 2019 will be given as 20% of the qualified income i.e the taxable income before the QBI deduction
Therefore,
The QBI deduction for 2019 = 20% of $285,000
= 0.20 × $285,000
= $57,000
Hence,
Option ( b ) $57,000