Answer: the original price of the skirt is $24
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x represent the original price of the skirt. if the original price of the blouse is 18, then the original price of the skirt and blouse is (x + 18)
Jade buys a blouse and a skirt for 3/4of their original price. It means that the amount at which she bought the skirt and blouse is
0.75(x + 18)
Applying the distributive property, it becomes
0.75x + 13.5
Jade pays a total of 31.50 for the two items. It means that
0.75x + 13.5 = 31.5
0.75x = 31.5 - 13.5
0.75x = 18
x = 18/0.75
x = $24
Answer:
Hi! Number 16 is inductive
The definition of "inductive" is the process of arriving at a conclusion based on a set of observations
Marvin arrived to his conclusion by observing the other dates.
Hope this helped!
ANSWER
EXPLANATION
The sum of the first 
terms of a geometric sequence is given by;
Where , is the number of terms and 
is the first term.
When 
, we have 
, we get;
Answer:
31.53
Step-by-step explanation:
6% of 525.50 is 31.53
if you look at the part where the first part connects with the second part:
y = 5 if x < - 2
y = -2x + 1 if -2 ≤ x < 1
we don't have a discontinuity there, so there shouldn't be a dot.
<h3>
</h3><h3>
What is wrong with the graph?</h3>
When we graph over intervals like (a, b) or [a, b] or something like that, we use dots to define the end of the intervals, and to denote that the function ends abruptly or we have a jump.
In this case, you can see that between the end and the second part and the beginning of the third part there is a jump, so the use of dots is correct there, but if you look at the part where the first part connects with the second part:
y = 5 if x < - 2
y = -2x + 1 if -2 ≤ x < 1
we don't have a discontinuity there, so there shouldn't be a dot.
That is the only error with the graph.
If you want to learn more about piecewise functions:
brainly.com/question/3628123
#SPJ1
