Answer:
What is the methodology?
The Methodology is "'a contextual framework' for research, a coherent and logical scheme based on views, beliefs, and values, that guides the choices researchers [or other users] make". In essence, the methodology is the discussion of methods. This includes the theoretical ideas and concerns that inform the use of different methods.
What is the content of the methodology?
The methodology describes the broad philosophical underpinning to your chosen research methods, including whether you are using qualitative or quantitative methods, or a mixture of both, and why. You should be clear about the academic basis for all the choices of research methods that you have made.
Lies in between the blue ridge mountains and the upper coastal plain.
Answer:
The correct answer is: Stablishing the tests validity.
Explanation:
Establishing the tests validity is understood as the act of evaluating whether a particular test measures what it says it mesures.
It is the most important criteria in establishing the quality of a test.
A test that has not been proved to have validity is obsolete and its results are unnecesary.
In this particular case, Dr. Chu developed a spatial reasoning test. She is then comparing the scores on her test with the scores and grades of students enrolled in courses that involve spatial reasoning.
In this instance, Dr. Chu is in the process of Stablishing the tests validity.
The idea of "consent of the governed"--that a government's power and legitimacy is only lawful if the people it exercises authority over agrees to it. The Founders believed that if a government was not consented to or ceaseed to be consented to by the people, it could justifiably be overthrown and replaced.
Answer:
Social responsibility is an ethical framework and suggests that an entity, be it an organization or individual, has an obligation to act for the benefit of society at large.[citation needed] Social responsibility is a duty every individual has to perform so as to maintain a balance between the economy and the ecosystems. A trade-off may exist between economic development, in the material sense, and the welfare of the society and environment,[1] though this has been challenged by many reports over the past decade.[when?][2][3] Social responsibility means sustaining the equilibrium between the two. It pertains not only to business organizations but also to everyone whose any action impacts the environment.[4] This responsibility can be passive, by avoiding engaging in socially harmful acts, or active, by performing activities that directly advance social goals. Social responsibility must be intergenerational since the actions of one generation have consequences on those following.[5]
Businesses can use ethical decision making to secure their businesses by making decisions that allow for government agencies to minimize their involvement with the corporation.[6] For instance if a company follows the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines for emissions on dangerous pollutants and even goes an extra step to get involved in the community and address those concerns that the public might have; they would be less likely to have the EPA investigate them for environmental concerns.[7] "A significant element of current thinking about privacy, however, stresses "self-regulation" rather than market or government mechanisms for protecting personal information".[8] According to some experts, most rules and regulations are formed due to public outcry, which threatens profit maximization and therefore the well-being of the shareholder, and that if there is not an outcry there often will be limited regulation.[9]
Some critics argue that corporate social responsibility (CSR) distracts from the fundamental economic role of businesses; others argue that it is nothing more than superficial window-dressing, or "greenwashing";[10] others argue that it is an attempt to pre-empt the role of governments as a watchdog over powerful corporations though there is no systematic evidence to support these criticisms. A significant number of studies have shown no negative influence on shareholder results from CSR but rather a slightly negative correlation with improved shareholder returns.[11]
Explanation:
plzz mark me as brainlist