Options
A. By noting that no degree of phenotypical difference is implied by the term Macro evolution.
B. By suggesting that Macro-evolution in contrast to Micro-evolution can not be explained or demonstrated by fossil records.
Answer:B. By suggesting that Macro-evolution in contrast to Micro-evolution can not be explained or demonstrated by fossil records.
Explanation: Macro-evolution is the evolution that is above the specie level of evolution example can be seen in Vicariance which is an evolution based on specie selection, independent evolution.
Micro-evolution is the type of evolution that describes the change in allele frequency that takes place from time to time through Mutation,gene drift gene flow, Natural or artificial selection etc. Modern-day creationists sometimes misunderstood the contrast between microevolution and macroevolution by suggesting that Macro-evolution in contrast to Micro-evolution can not be explained or demonstrated by fossil records.
Charles Spearman’s <em>concept of g</em> is most accurately defined as:
- a single, underlying intellectual capacity measured by intelligence test
<h3>What is Intellectual Capacity?</h3>
This refers to the ability of a person to process things at a faster rate which shows a sign of high intelligence.
With this in mind, we can see that the Charles Spearman's concept of G is defined as the singular intellectual capacity which is measured by the use of an intelligence test.
Read more about Charles Spearman here:
brainly.com/question/7225916
Answer:
Uluru. also known as Ayers Rock
Explanation:
it is a large sandstone formation in the southern part of the Northern Territory in Australia. It lies 335 km (208 mi) southwest of the nearest large town: Alice Springs.
Explanation:
milk egosu peynirini family
