Answer:
Promissory estoppel
Explanation:
If an oral contract has been declared unenforceable under the statute of frauds, yet one of the parties has rendered some performance under the contract that conferred benefits on the other party, he or she can recover the reasonable value of the performance in <u>promissory estoppel</u>.
The statute of fraud requires that contracts exceeding $500 in value, or involves the sale of landed property or extending a period of a year or more in length must be in writing and not oral. However, in a situation whereby a party has rendered some performance in the contract that confers benefits on the other party, the other party is obligated to also perform his/her part of the contract under the doctrine of promissory estoppel. The doctrine of promissory estoppel insist that an individual or party to a contract must perform his/her obligation or promise, even though there is not written proof of a contract as far as the other party has rendered some form of performance.
Answer: He meant that there is no proper policies put in place to prevent more people from being imprisoned.
Explanation:
Dan Pacholke was a reformer and a prison administrator with experience of over thirty years. Pacholke made several efforts throughout his years as a prison administrator to help in improving the living conditions of prisoners, which include giving them education programs and allowing them to be more productive for the economy.
What he meant by saying that the system has become good at containing individuals who have fallen through all other social safety nets, was that there were minimal efforts put in place in order to prevent people from participating in actions that would make them go to prisons. This implies that there were no proactive program to put off people from committing more crimes but a reactive one which would allow people commit more crimes and go to prisons.
They crossed the Ionian Sea so they traveled 400 miles (640 kilometers)
