Answer:
c
Explanation:
he wants all of those things
Answer:
payback 5 years
if the ltaer years cash flow increases several times, it would not affect the payback date. This is a disavantage of this method, it is focus on recover the investment without considering the total cash flow of the project.
Explanation:
Payback = the time in the life of a project on which the initial ivnestment is recover.
-31,000 Balance
Year 1 2,000 - 29,000
Year 2 0 - 29,000
Year 3 8,000 - 21,000
Year 4 9,000 - 12,000
Year 5 12,000 0
At year 5 the proejct achieve payback
Answer:
$2.58 per machine hour
Explanation:
The computation of the fabrication activity cost pool activity rate is
= ($461,000 × 15%) + ($123,000 × 15%) + ($207,000 × 20%) ÷ 50,000 machine hours
= ($69,150 + $18,450 + $41,400) ÷ 50,000 machine hours
= $2.58 per machine hour
<span>This is false. An increase in demand is more major than an increase in quantity demanded. Quantity demand refers to the demand of a product at a particular price and is only a movement on the demand curve. An increase in demand would cause the demand curve to shift which is more major than a movement and it encompasses the entire relationship between price and demand.</span>
Note:
I wasn't able to access the Chester Income Statement but I successfully accessed a similar question Digby.
The Complete Question is as under:
Refer to the HR Reports in the Inquirer. Through past investments in recruiting and training Digby has obtained a productivity index of 109.6%. This means that Digby's labor costs would be increased by 9.6% if it did not have these productivity improvements. This is a competitive advantage that Digby can sustain or even widen further if its competitors have no HR initiatives. Now, refer to the Income Statement in Digby's Annual Report. How much did Digby's productivity improvements save it in direct labor costs (in thousands) last year?
A. $766
B. $29818
C. $3137
D. $3211
Answer:
Option D. $3,137
Explanation:
The Productivity Index of 9.6% shows that if the improvement plan is implemented then the efficiency gains would result in saving of 9.6% of total direct cost. So if we total the direct cost for the year for all of the four products then we have an amount of $32,680 which is given at the second last column.
The amount saved last year would be:
Savings = $32,680 * 9.6% = $3,137
Hence the option C is correct here.
