the right answer is: that educating adolescents about how to make better choices to avoid the consequences of risky behaviors does not reduce the number of risky behaviors committed by adolescents.
Because according to studies on the peer influence of adolescents and decision making says that moving past research center investigations of age contrasts in "cool" psychological procedures identified with hazard discernment and thinking, new methodologies have moved concentration to the impact of social and enthusiastic factors on immature neurocognition. When teenagers invest an expanding measure of energy with their companions, explore recommends that peer-related boosts may sharpen the reward framework to react to the reward estimation of dangerous conduct. As the intellectual control framework step by step develops through the span of the high school years, teenagers develop in their ability to facilitate influence and insight, and to practice self-direction even insincerely stimulating circumstances. These limits are reflected in progressive development in the ability to oppose peer impact.
Urban planning was all the more a science itself, a monstrous recreational place amidst the city was something inconspicuous before in the previous history of urban arranging likewise building up the field, social arranging.
Urban planning gave natives spots of relaxation and enhanced the association of urban areas
Just from the position of cartridge cases and bullets, it is possible to deduce what kind of firearm was used in the crime (for instance: whether it was a small pistol or a larger weapon such as a rifle), the shooter's possible position (the place where the firearm was being fired during the crime), and the shots' trajectory (if the bullets have penetrated any surface or object before hitting its targets or stopping).
I believe the answer is: The advocates’ actions are moral because sometimes there are duties and moral laws higher than those prescribed by civil law.
Civil law tend to created based on what is generally accepted by people at the time it's created. Because of this, many civil laws that is made in the past might be seen as unjust in society today. For example, the civil laws in the past only give the right to vote in the election to Men.
The answer is B
Early humans were not farmers they lived off what the land provided as well as the animal did too.
There are still human today that are nomadic
Hope this helps
