Answer:
this perspective is inaccurate because characters using informal language doesn’t mean that they’re unintelligent.
Explanation:
it’s the same thing for formal language. there’s a time and place for both informal and formal language. if a bunch of characters are friends and hanging out, then they’d want to use informal language with each other. informal language can also be more realistic to use for characters. for example if all characters in a book are in high school, it would be really unrealistic to have all of them use formal language and walking around talking like they're in a job interview.
those critics are assuming that informal language = unintelligent characters when that is just not true. characters can be intelligent and still use informal language because that’s normal for them or they’re in a place with people where using informal language is better.
Well the reason you were watching at 9 o clock was bc you have no life
It is defining.
Defining relative clause does not have a comma, while a non-defining relative clause has.
For example, if the sentence is:
The children, who hate chocolates, are uncommon.
- since there is comma in this sentence, it is non-defining.
- while if there is no comma like the question in the picture, it is defining.
The difference is that in traditional drama, it is written
in the strict format while modern drama follows a more flexible style where
there is no outcome. Traditional dramas
in verse and prose format while modern dramas make use of verses. The characters of modern drama are routine
type characters while traditional drama characters are more distinct.
You are correct! The point of view is third person! Hope this helps and good luck!
