1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
grigory [225]
3 years ago
10

The Sixth Amendment says that a person who is accused of a crime has the right to a jury trial. In a jury trial, regular citizen

s determine if the accused person is guilty or not guilty. Which of the following might happen if citizens did not have this right?
1. The government might be able to send an accused person to jail for unfair reasons.

2. It might be easier for suspects who are guilty of crimes to win their cases and go free.
3. Police might not be able to arrest suspects for crimes, even if they had proper evidence.

4. It might be impossible to keep records of everything that was said during the course of a trial.
History
1 answer:
Montano1993 [528]3 years ago
4 0

1. <em>"The goverment might be able to send an accused person to jail for unfair reasons."</em>

<em></em>

<em>If people can't have the right to a fair trial, anyone could be in jail for no reason.</em>

You might be interested in
According to Pericles, how is Athens different from other Greek city-states
True [87]
Because they were different from the other city-states, and they had a different government system.

Kept poor people from serving the state. Imitated the laws of its neighbors. Treated all its people fairly regardless of class.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
please hurry ! The Ottoman Empire formed a capitulation with King Francis I of France creating the Franco-Ottoman Alliance. As a
Viefleur [7K]

Answer:

b) The Franco-Ottoman Alliance had to face the enemies of the Hapsburg Empire.

Note:

I hope I've helped

UwU

3 0
3 years ago
How did the Indian Removal Act of 1830 contribute to religious discrimination against Native Americans? A) It prohibited the pri
Zina [86]
It's c
The Indian Removal Act<span> of 1830 contributed to religious discrimination against Native Americans because </span>it prevented Native Americans from practicing their faith in sacred areas<span>.The Indian Removal Act forced many Native American groups to move from their native lands to </span>reservations<span> in the American </span>Midwest<span> and Southwest.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which detail does not describe the life and achievements of Silas Hunt?
Nady [450]

Answer:

The answer is C

Explanation:

I just took the test✨

6 0
3 years ago
Weź mi ktoś z tym pomóż bo musze szybko zrobić a nwm jak bo w książce nic o tym nie ma.
zubka84 [21]

Answer:

sorry cant help

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which is the best definition of public policy?
    13·2 answers
  • How many states ratified the constitution right away
    10·1 answer
  • Between 1763 and 1783 what country lost much of its land in the east
    13·2 answers
  • How did farmers become enlightened on political affairs?
    10·3 answers
  • Choose all that apply.
    5·1 answer
  • On February 24, 1868, President Andrew Johnson was impeached by
    9·2 answers
  • “Brinkmanship” is the practice of taking a dispute to the edge of conflict and
    7·2 answers
  • Que a pasado con los suelos en el norte y noroeste del país en los últimos años?
    10·1 answer
  • What is NOT one of the things that make it difficult to live in the mountains.?
    10·2 answers
  • How might studying the Mayflower Compact improve our society today?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!