If you study the declaration of independence closely, it us
clear that the declaration demands rights. And the oppressive regimes of the
world would be unwilling to grant those rights. In order to achieve those rights,
one will have to fight. And that will pave the way for war. It has become
evident now after centuries. United States believed in the rights and freedom
of the people. That had the U.S entering the world wars. All the wars after
that too, were basically based on this very idea. FREEDOM.
Yes because the bill of rights are just like laws.For example if some one committed a crime as bad as it is they are still people and no matter what the government thinks they still have their rights
One major difference between Noah’s and Rector’s historical interpretation of the War on Poverty is Noah described poverty as a societal failure rather than personal moral failings.
Explanation:
In the interpretation of the war on poverty Noah and Rector does not possess same thinking. As Noah thought that poverty is a social curse in which one has nothing to do. War is one of the cause of financial crisis that led to poverty in the society. People used to lose their property, money everything in the war.
On the other side Rector do not think that poverty is a social curse. He thought that poverty is caused to anyone due to the failings of one's personal moral values. He thought poverty can be replenished if anyone's want. It has no power to be heavy on one's life.
<span>A.Television programs can be streamed to mobile devices through the Internet. </span>
<span>Pierre de Coubertin was born 1st January, 1863, in Paris. He was a founding member of the International Olympic Committee. As a result of his classical and strong education, he idolised the Olympic Games of the Ancient Greeks, and revitalised them for audiences today.</span>
