Answer: is a straight line that passes through the orgin hope it helps
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The answer is below
Step-by-step explanation:
1) The number of rooms Joe company needs is 50. Let the number of rooms needed be n, this can be represented by the inequality:
n ≥ 50
Joe has already reserved 16 rooms, therefore the number of additional rooms needed to be reserved = 50 - 16 = 34 rooms. At least 34 rooms have to be reserved, if B is the number of additional blocks that Joe reserves, the inequality is:
B ≥ 34
2) Each block contains 8 rooms therefore the minimum number of block (a) needed to be reserved = 34/8 = 4.25 = 5 to the next whole number. Therefore the minimum number of blocks needed is given as:
a ≥ 5
Since each block cost $900, let c represent the minimum amount of money needed, therefore the least amount of money needed is given as:
c = $900(5) = $4500
c ≥ $4500
Mean, mu=44 cm
standard deviation, sigma = 4 cm
X=41
We calculate the Z-value for 41 cm
Z(41)=(41-mu)/sigma=(41-44)/4=-0.75
The probability that x>X
P(x>X)
=P(x>41)
=1-P(x<41)
=1-0.2266274 (from standard normal distribution tables for left-tail of Z=-0.75)
= 0.7733726
Answer:
3.785 litres
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
-5 ≤ x
Step-by-step explanation:
2(x -3) -5x ≤ 9 . . . . . given
2x -6 -5x ≤ 9 . . . . . . eliminate parentheses
-3x -6 ≤ 9 . . . . . . . . combine like terms
-6 ≤ 9 +3x . . . . . . . add 3x
-15 ≤ 3x . . . . . . . . subtract 9
-5 ≤ x . . . . . . . . . divide by 3
__
The point x=-5 is included in the solution set, so there is a sold dot at that point. The rest of the solution set is values of x that are greater than that value, so the number line is shaded to the right of that point. Your number line should show an arrow at the right end of the graph to indicate it extends that direction indefinitely. (My graphing program doesn't draw arrows easily.)
_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
Perhaps the most straightforward way to solve this would have been to add 6 instead of 3x. That would give ...
-3x ≤ 15
Then dividing by -3 would give x. That operation would reverse the inequality symbol (because the divisor is negative). Then you would have ...
x ≥ -5
Either way works. We judge it to be less confusing when we don't have to change the direction of the inequality symbol.