Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The roots are the values of x for which x² + 3x - 5 = 0.
Quadratic formula:
x = [-3±√(3²-4(1)(-5))]/(2·1) = [-3±√29]/2
Its an indirect proof, so 3 steps :-
1) you start with the opposite of wat u need to prove
2) arrive at a contradiction
3) concludeReport · 29/6/2015261
since you wanto prove 'diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other', you start wid the opposite of above statement, like below :- step1 : Since we want to prove 'diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other', lets start by assuming the opposite, that the diagonals of parallelogram dont bisect each other.Report · 29/6/2015261
Since, we assumed that the diagonals dont bisect each other,
OC≠OA
OD≠OBReport · 29/6/2015261
Since, OC≠OA, △OAD is not congruent to △OCBReport · 29/6/2015261
∠AOD≅∠BOC as they are vertical angles,
∠OAD≅∠OCB they are alternate interior angles
AD≅BC, by definition of parallelogram
so, by AAS, △OAD is congruent to △OCBReport · 29/6/2015261
But, thats a contradiction as we have previously established that those triangles are congruentReport · 29/6/2015261
step3 :
since we arrived at a contradiction, our assumption is wrong. so, the opposite of our assumption must be correct. so diagonals of parallelogram bisect each other.
Answer:
x = -4y
<em>Hope that helps! :)</em>
<em>-Aphrodite</em>
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
When the base is less than 1 it's Decay
When the base is greater than 1 it's Growth
Answer:
20
Step-by-step explanation:
Use <u>PEMDAS</u>
P = parenthesis
E = Exponents
M = Multiplication*
D = Division*
A = Addition**
S = Subtraction**
*either can come first, it just depends which comes first in the equation.
**either can come first, it just depends which comes first in the equation.
<em>Step 1 : Write equation</em> 4( 9 × 2 ) ÷ ( 4 -1 ) - 4
<em>Step 2: Solve in parenthesis </em>4(18) ÷ (3) - 4
<em>Step 3: Solve multiplication </em> 72 ÷ 3 - 4
<em>Step 4: Solve division </em>24 - 4
<em>Step 5 : Solve subtraction</em> 20
