1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ksju [112]
3 years ago
10

The Rana's themselves were responsible for the downfall of Rana Regime.How ?

History
1 answer:
Artyom0805 [142]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

<em>Rana regime was established at the cost of many innocent lives and it was doomed to fail. Ordinary people from the very beginning had developed hatred and distaste for the system through they couldn't bring it out easily. Rana autocracy could eventually be overthrown by an armed revolution in 2007 BS. </em>

<em />

You might be interested in
What year was the treaty of Brest litovsk signed?
horrorfan [7]
March 3rd, 1918 is the date the treaty was signed.
3 0
4 years ago
Why did christopher columbus end up enslaving the native americans and treating them harshly?
AysviL [449]
Because he found out they had gold and cures and they knew the land well and how to hunt and find food
3 0
4 years ago
Were human beings better off after the Neolithic Revolution?
worty [1.4K]

i personally think so but somtimes think no, The Neolithic Revolution, Neolithic Demographic Transition, Agricultural Revolution, or First Agricultural Revolution, was the wide-scale transition of many human cultures during the Neolithic period from a lifestyle of hunting and gathering to one of agriculture and settlement, making an increasingly larger population possible. These settled communities permitted humans to observe and experiment with plants to learn how they grew and developed. This new knowledge led to the domestication of plants.


Archaeological data indicates that the domestication of various types of plants and animals happened in separate locations worldwide, starting in the geological epoch of the Holocene[4] around 12,500 years ago.[5] It was the world's first historically verifiable revolution in agriculture. The Neolithic Revolution greatly narrowed the diversity of foods available, resulting in a downturn in human nutrition.


The Neolithic Revolution involved far more than the adoption of a limited set of food-producing techniques. During the next millennia it would transform the small and mobile groups of hunter-gatherers that had hitherto dominated human pre-history into sedentary (non-nomadic) societies based in built-up villages and towns. These societies radically modified their natural environment by means of specialized food-crop cultivation, with activities such as irrigation and deforestation which allowed the production of surplus food. Other developments found very widely are the domestication of animals, pottery, polished stone tools, and rectangular houses.


These developments, sometimes called the Neolithic package, provided the basis for densely populated settlements, specialization and division of labour, more trade, the development of non-portable art and architecture, centralized administrations and political structures, hierarchical ideologies, depersonalized systems of knowledge (e.g. writing), and property ownership. The earliest known civilization developed in Sumer in southern Mesopotamia (c. 5,500 BP); its emergence also heralded the beginning of the Bronze Age.


The relationship of the above-mentioned Neolithic characteristics to the onset of agriculture, their sequence of emergence, and empirical relation to each other at various Neolithic sites remains the subject of academic debate, and varies from place to place, rather than being the outcome of universal laws of social evolution. The Levant saw the earliest developments of the Neolithic Revolution from around 10,000 BCE, followed by sites in the wider Fertile Crescent.

4 0
3 years ago
During World War I, most attacks in no-man’s-land led to
NikAS [45]
<span>During World War I, most attacks in no-man’s-land led to death, no tangible territorial gains and mass suffering on both sides </span>
4 0
3 years ago
At "show" trials during the great purge, suspects often?
Shkiper50 [21]
The question ask to state what the suspect do at show trials during the great purge, and base on my research and further investigation, I would say that they often admitted to fault even when they were completely innocent, in the hopes of receiving a reduced sentence or avoiding the labor camps in the East. I hope this would help 
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is a characteristic of the Puritans in Massachusetts
    5·1 answer
  • Select the two African regions on the map that remained independent through the nineteenth century.
    13·2 answers
  • How did technology affect Aryan trade and welfare?
    8·1 answer
  • Which guideline helps historians place arguments in historical context?
    15·2 answers
  • What were the names of the and countries that made up the alliances in World War 2?
    7·1 answer
  • Which legislation enacted by President Roosevelt and Congress brought hydroelectric power and industrial growth to parts of the
    10·1 answer
  • Match the causes of the revolution in Romania with their effects
    11·1 answer
  • Who ruled after Augustus Caesar?
    9·1 answer
  • The ------------- of a business decision involves giving up the next best alternative to the choice that is made.
    14·1 answer
  • 1. What is one possible positive consequence of Japanese isolation that Hall points out?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!