Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The hypothesis is written as follows
For the null hypothesis,
µd ≤ 10
For the alternative hypothesis,
µ > 10
This is a right tailed test
Since no population standard deviation is given, the distribution is a student's t.
Since n = 97
Degrees of freedom, df = n - 1 = 97 - 1 = 96
t = (x - µ)/(s/√n)
Where
x = sample mean = 8.9
µ = population mean = 10
s = samples standard deviation = 3.6
t = (8.9 - 10)/(3.6/√97) = - 3
We would determine the p value using the t test calculator. It becomes
p = 0.00172
Since alpha, 0.01 > than the p value, 0.00172, then we would reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, At a 1% level of significance, there is enough evidence that the data do not support the vendor’s claim.
Do you want the answer or it written out? The written out would be down below and the answer is also down below in the x to the power of x equals 8/3 and its written out.
okay ....... i'm going to ur other question
The answer is B.
You need to subtract 15% each year from the value of the car.
![\bf \begin{cases} f(x)=\sqrt[3]{7x-2}\\\\ g(x)=\cfrac{x^3+2}{7} \end{cases}\\\\ -----------------------------\\\\ now \\\\ f[\ g(x)\ ]\implies f\left[ \frac{x^3+2}{7} \right]\implies \sqrt[3]{7\left[ \frac{x^3+2}{7} \right]-2}\implies \sqrt[3]{x^3+2-2} \\\\\\ \sqrt[3]{x^3}\implies x\\\\ -----------------------------\\\\ or \\\\ g[\ f(x)\ ]\implies g\left[\sqrt[3]{7x-2}\right]\implies \cfrac{\left[\sqrt[3]{7x-2}\right]^3+2}{7} \\\\\\ \cfrac{7x-2+2}{7}\implies \cfrac{7x}{7}\implies x](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20%5Cbegin%7Bcases%7D%0Af%28x%29%3D%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B7x-2%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%0Ag%28x%29%3D%5Ccfrac%7Bx%5E3%2B2%7D%7B7%7D%0A%5Cend%7Bcases%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A-----------------------------%5C%5C%5C%5C%0Anow%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%0Af%5B%5C%20g%28x%29%5C%20%5D%5Cimplies%20f%5Cleft%5B%20%5Cfrac%7Bx%5E3%2B2%7D%7B7%7D%20%5Cright%5D%5Cimplies%20%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B7%5Cleft%5B%20%5Cfrac%7Bx%5E3%2B2%7D%7B7%7D%20%5Cright%5D-2%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7Bx%5E3%2B2-2%7D%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7Bx%5E3%7D%5Cimplies%20x%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A-----------------------------%5C%5C%5C%5C%0Aor%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%0Ag%5B%5C%20f%28x%29%5C%20%5D%5Cimplies%20g%5Cleft%5B%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B7x-2%7D%5Cright%5D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Cleft%5B%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B7x-2%7D%5Cright%5D%5E3%2B2%7D%7B7%7D%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A%5Ccfrac%7B7x-2%2B2%7D%7B7%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B7x%7D%7B7%7D%5Cimplies%20x)
thus f[ g(x) ] = x indeed, or g[ f(x) ] =x, thus they're indeed inverse of each other
