1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Svetradugi [14.3K]
3 years ago
11

Help me plss HAHHHHAHAHA

English
1 answer:
kykrilka [37]3 years ago
8 0

Chile anyways thx for the points

You might be interested in
After Hamlet tells his mother that his inner sorrow is enormous. what advice does Claudis tell Hamlet about his mourning of his
krok68 [10]

In "Hamlet", Act I, Scene II, Claudius and Gertrude as Hamlet to cheer up, and tell him that every living thing has to die, so it is useless to keep mourning for his father. Hamlet answers that he is suffering more than they can see, nothing can express the way he feels. Then Claudius says that everybody loses his father because it is a law of nature and tells Hamlet to stop mourning because it is a crime against God, against the dead and against nature. Claudius then tells Hamlet to start thinking of him as his new father and treat him in this way. And he also asks Hamlet not to leave Denmark.

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
One reason for making a new outline of your work while revising is to ____.
Simora [160]
Have all of your new data in a form that is easy to find and understand
7 0
3 years ago
HELP! HELP HELP <br> What is hate speech and how can it potentially lead to genocide?
sesenic [268]

While hate speech can often be dismissed as bigoted ranting or merely painful words, it could also serve as an important warning sign for a much more severe consequence: genocide. Increasingly virulent hate speech is often a precursor to mass violence. World Policy Institute fellow Susan Benesch, along with Dr. Francis Deng, the United Nations Special Advisor on the Prevention of Genocide (OSAPG), is attempting to find methods for preventing or limiting such violence,  by examining the effects of speech upon a population. Initiated in February 2010, Benesch’s project,  is funded by the MacArthur Foundation, the US Institute of Peace and the Fetzer Institute. It was inspired by the high levels of inflammatory speech preceding Rwandan genocide and the Bosnian war of the  mid-1990s. Since then, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda  has recognized the relationship between hate speech and genocide by trying the world’s first “incitement to genocide” cases, convicting radio broadcasters, a newspaper editor, and even a pop star for the crime. Following suit, the International Criminal Court has indicted a Kenyan radio host for broadcasts preceding the post-election violence of 2007-2008 in Kenya

In 1995 the ICC convicted Jean-Paul Akayesu, a former Rwandan bourgmestre—or mayor—for incitement to genocide after he  gave a speech that was immediately followed by massacres. Benesch noted, however, that Akayesu’s words did not catalyze genocide in the country, since mass killings had already begun elsewhere in Rwanda by the time he spoke.  

On October 28, 2010Benesch joined Deng at the United Nations for a panel discussion on their project and genocide prevention. Populations do not rise up  overnight to commit spontaneous, collective acts of genocide. Deng said. They “undergo collective social processes fueled by inflammatory speech.”  

There is an important distinction between limiting speech and limiting its dangerousness, Benesch said. It is vital to examine the context in which speech is made in order to properly determine the motivation behind it – and the effect it is likely to have. The dangerousness of speech cannot be estimated outside the  context in which it was made or disseminated, and its original message can become lost in translation.

Within context, speech can take on new meaning. “Are there particular aspects of the context that make a particular speech act more dangerous?” Benesch asked her audience on Thursday. “In other words, [are there factors] more likely to catalyze a particular form of incitement, like incitement to genocide, than other factors?”

Speech can also become less harmful if its sources are not credible, discredited or unseen by the population.

“The law has not yet distinguished fully between incitement to genocide on the one hand, and on the other hand the much broader and variously defined category of hate speech,” Benesch said. She is working on developing a coherent definition so as to distinguish incitement to genocide from hate speech, a difficult task as a “particularly heinous crime is pressed up, conceptually speaking, against a particular cherished and fundamental right, which is the right of freedom of expression.” The challenge lies in walking the fine line between monitoring and recognizing incitement to genocide and avoiding measures that may lead to over-restricted speech.

It is possible to limit the dissemination of speech if not the speech itself, which is a possibility that may be conducive to the goal of not infringing upon freedom of speech and expression. In striving to identify what it is exactly that makes a particular speech act “hate speech” on the one hand or dangerous “incitement to genocide” on the other, Benesch presented her theory: that hate speech can be performed successfully by anyone, but not everyone can successfully use speech to incite genocide. The power and influence of the figure  addressing the speech to a particular audience, along with the contextual factors of that speaker and that audience (i.e. creating false scenarios of self-defense, in which the targeted group are accused of undue murderous acts), are substantial factors in distinguishing hate speech from incitement to genocide. The proposed policy responses include: logistical efforts to hinder inflammatory broadcasts (such as jamming radio waves), prosecution and arrests, and education. Getting the public involved and aware of the poisonous nature of inflammatory speech and how it can manipulate the masses is a key strategy in combating mass violence.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
An Excerpt from “Optimism”
OLga [1]

Answer:

An Excerpt from “Optimism”

by Helen Keller

1 Could we choose our environment, and were desire in human undertakings synonymous with

endowment, all men would, I suppose, be optimists. Certainly most of us regard happiness as

the proper end of all earthly enterprise. The will to be happy animates alike the philosopher, the

prince and the chimney-sweep. No matter how dull, or how mean, or how wise a man is, he feels

that happiness is his indisputable right.

2 It is curious to observe what different ideals of happiness people cherish, and in what singular

places they look for this well-spring of their life. Many look for it in the hoarding of riches, some

in the pride of power, and others in the achievements of art and literature; a few seek it in the

exploration of their own minds, or in the search for knowledge.

3 Most people measure their happiness in terms of physical pleasure and material possession.

Could they win some visible goal which they have set on the horizon, how happy they would be!

Lacking this gift or that circumstance, they would be miserable. If happiness is to be so

measured, I who cannot hear or see have every reason to sit in a corner with folded hands and

weep. If I am happy in spite of my deprivations, if my happiness is so deep that it is a faith, so

thoughtful that it becomes a philosophy of life,—if, in short, I am an optimist, my testimony to

the creed of optimism is worth hearing....

4 Once I knew the depth where no hope was, and darkness lay on the face of all things. Then

love came and set my soul free. Once I knew only darkness and stillness. Now I know hope and

joy. Once I fretted and beat myself against the wall that shut me in. Now I rejoice in the

consciousness that I can think, act and attain heaven. My life was without past or future; death,

the pessimist would say, “a consummation devoutly to be wished.” But a little word from the

fingers of another fell into my hand that clutched at emptiness, and my heart leaped to the

rapture of living. Night fled before the day of thought, and love and joy and hope came up in a

passion of obedience to knowledge. Can anyone who has escaped such captivity, who has felt

the thrill and glory of freedom, be a pessimist?

5 My early experience was thus a leap from bad to good. If I tried, I could not check the

momentum of my first leap out of the dark; to move breast forward is a habit learned suddenly

at that first moment of release and rush into the light. With the first word I used intelligently, I

learned to live, to think, to hope. Darkness cannot shut me in again. I have had a glimpse of the

shore, and can now live by the hope of reaching it.

6 So my optimism is no mild and unreasoning satisfaction. A poet once said I must be happy

because I did not see the bare, cold present, but lived in a beautiful dream. I do live in a

beautiful dream; but that dream is the actual, the present,—not cold, but warm; not bare, but

furnished with a thousand blessings. The very evil which the poet supposed would be a cruel

6) Read the last sentence from the text.

Only by contact with evil could I have learned to feel by contrast the beauty of truth and love and goodness.

Explain how Helen Keller develops this idea in the text. Use specific details to

support your answer.

8 0
3 years ago
Which statement best describes the purpose of the introductory paragraph in a compare-and-contrast essay?
garik1379 [7]

<u>herencia</u><u> </u><em><u>no</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>se</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>jeje</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>zorry</u></em>

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The play A Doll’s House, by Henrik Ibsen, is set in the Victorian era. The two main characters are Torvald Helmer, a bank manage
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following best defines post-secondary eduction?
    8·2 answers
  • Which of these techniques is the best way to pull together various facts and ideas in a group discussion?
    14·2 answers
  • Who are some of the important artists associated with this guitar or similar guitars?
    10·1 answer
  • Social commentary includes
    13·1 answer
  • TIME REMAINING
    9·1 answer
  • Can somebody help me find hoping please!!!!!!!!!!
    14·1 answer
  • 1. Jerry has a few best friends that he speaks to very often. He plays videogames very often with
    8·1 answer
  • Select the sentence that is incorrect (or uses the WRONG pronoun) in each group.
    9·1 answer
  • The following sentences are run-on sentences. Correct each sentences by adding a conjunction (and, or, but, because, so) or punc
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!