This is the distributive property. You take what is outside of the parenthesis and DISTRIBUTE it inside the parenthesis.
I believe your answer would be D.) because the triangles were already proven to be congruent
We can reject the last one: subtracting a non-zero value will result in a smaller value.
So now we have:
<span>2(A + B)
(A + B)2
A2 + B2
If all of them are mulptiplications, then they are all equivalent!
I mean by this, if what you meant is this:
</span>
<span>2*(A + B)
(A + B)*2
A*2 + B*2
If there is no sign, then the multiplication sign is implicit,
and all of these expressions say exactly the same: two of A and two of B.
</span>
Answer:
i think 0 slop. wait for the other person to answers this, to be sure of the answer
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
1). g(-9) = -81.914
2). Last option
Step-by-step explanation:
1). f(x) = x²
For x = -9
f(-9) = (-9)² = 81
g(x) = ![\frac{32}{2x-17}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B32%7D%7B2x-17%7D)
g(-9) = ![\frac{32}{[2(-9)-17]}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B32%7D%7B%5B2%28-9%29-17%5D%7D)
= ![\frac{32}{-35}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B32%7D%7B-35%7D)
= -
(g - f)(-9) = g(-9) - f(-9)
= ![-\frac{32}{35}-81](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=-%5Cfrac%7B32%7D%7B35%7D-81)
= ![\frac{-32-2835}{35}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B-32-2835%7D%7B35%7D)
= ![-\frac{2867}{35}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=-%5Cfrac%7B2867%7D%7B35%7D)
= -81.914
2). The relation is not a function because this function doesn't passes a vertical line test.
Last option will be the answer.