Answer: x=0,3 . . . . . .
1. Yes they are congruent. You translate AB to move it over to CD. Specifically, shift 2 units to the right.
2. No, they are not congruent. QR is longer than MN. Congruent segments must be the same length.
3. No, they are not congruent. At first glance, they seem to be congruent after translation and reflection. However, XY is longer than UV, and those legs should be the same length for a pair of congruent triangles to be possible.
4. Yes they are congruent. You translate triangle ABC to move it over to triangle DEF (shift 1 to the left, 3 down).
Answer:
The point is NOT on the line.
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1: Write out equation
y = -x + 3
Step 2: Define point
A(6, 3)
x = 6, y = 3
Step 3: Plug in coordinates
3 = -(6) + 3
3 = -6 + 3
3 ≠ -3
I think it would either be 2,000 or 1,900 bc if you multiply 65 and 29 then you get 1,885 and if you round that it would be 2,000 or 1,900
